RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 COVID-19 diagnosis and study of serum SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA, IgM and IgG by chemiluminescence immunoanalysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.17.20064907
DO 10.1101/2020.04.17.20064907
A1 Ma, Huan
A1 Zeng, Weihong
A1 He, Hongliang
A1 Zhao, Dan
A1 Yang, Yunru
A1 Jiang, Dehua
A1 Qi, Peigen Yingjie
A1 He, Weihuang
A1 Zhao, Changcheng
A1 Yi, Ruting
A1 Wang, Xiaofang
A1 Wang, Bo
A1 Yang, Yuanhong Yun
A1 Kombe Kombe, Arnaud John
A1 Ding, Chengchao
A1 Xie, Jiajia
A1 Gao, Yong
A1 Cheng, Linzhao
A1 Li, Yajuan
A1 Ma, Xiaoling
A1 Jin, Tengchuan
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/30/2020.04.17.20064907.abstract
AB Background The pandemic of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is causing great loss. Detecting viral RNAs is standard approach for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis with variable success. Currently, studies describing the serological diagnostic methods are emerging, while most of them just involve the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM and IgG by ELISA or “flow immunoassay” with limited accuracy.Methods Diagnostic approach depends on chemiluminescence immunoanalysis (CLIA) for detecting IgA, IgM and IgG specific to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) and receptor-binding domain (RBD) was developed. The approach was tested with 216 sera from 87 COVID-19 patients and 483 sera from SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Concentration kinetics of RBD-specific serum antibodies were characterized. The relationship of serum RBD-specific antibodies and disease severity was analyzed.Results The diagnostic accuracy based on RBD outperformed those based on NP. Adding IgA to a conventional serological test containing IgM and IgG improves sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis at early stage. CLIA for detecting RBD-specific IgA, IgM and IgG showed diagnostic sensitivities of 98.6%, 96.8% and 96.8%, and specificities of 98.1%, 92.3% and 99.8%, respectively. Median concentration of IgA and IgM peaked during 16-20 days after illness onset at 8.84 μg/mL and 7.25 μg/mL, respectively, while IgG peaked during 21-25 days after illness onset at 16.47 μg/mL. Furthermore, the serum IgA level positively correlates with COVID-19 severity.Conclusion CLIA for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgA, IgM and IgG in blood provides additional values for diagnosing and monitoring of COVID-19.Summary Chemiluminescence immunoanalysis of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific serum IgA as well as IgM and IgG improves accuracy of COVID-19 diagnosis. Concentration kinetics of serum RBD-specific IgA, IgM and IgG are revealed. Serum IgA levels positively correlate with COVID-19 severity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementT.J. is supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB29030104), National Natural Science Fund (Grant No.: 31870731 and U1732109), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2070000108). TJ and XLM is supported by a COVID-19 special task grant supported by Chinese Academy of Science Clinical Research Hospital (Hefei) with Grant No. YD2070002017 and YD2070002001, respectively. M.H. is supported by the new medical science fund of USTC (WK2070000130).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to our manuscript is available.