PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Alstott, James D AU - Gent, Chariti AU - Bell, Christine Fabian AU - Marlin, Daniel R AU - Hernandez, Anthony AU - Schulman, Esther AU - Gehl, Sharon AU - Schnapp, Lynn M AU - Stein, James H TI - A Novel Coach-Approach to Clinical Faculty Mentoring and the UW Department of Medicine Clinical Faculty Development Program AID - 10.1101/2024.03.21.24304694 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.03.21.24304694 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/24/2024.03.21.24304694.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/24/2024.03.21.24304694.full AB - Background Clinical faculty at academic health centers may benefit from specific mentorship and proficiencies that are distinct from those on research tracks. We describe the creation, activities, and one-year impact of a faculty development program that included novel professional coaching training (the Clinical Faculty Mentoring Program, CFMP) which was supplemented by skills- and knowledge-building activities (the Clinical Faculty Development Series, CFDS).Methods The goals and components of the CFMP and CFDS are described in detail. A mixed methods evaluation plan guided collection of confidential survey and interview data before and after the first year of these activities. We used paired t-tests to identify statistically significant changes.Results The 43 clinical mentors reported significant gains in job satisfaction, teaching attitudes, knowledge of mentorship competencies, and confidence with coaching skills for mentorship (all p<0.05). Of mentor respondents, 88% found the coach approach to mentoring program to be “very” or “somewhat” helpful. Coaching behavioral domains with the greatest evidence of improvement were supporting the mentee to integrate new awareness, insight, learning into their worldview and behaviors (p=0.0503) and managing time and focus of mentoring sessions (p=0.022). All 37 mentees had at least one meeting with a mentor (100%). Over 9 months, 39 virtual CFDS sessions had an average participation of 38 participants (range 22-59). A majority of surveyed faculty (>55%) agreed or strongly agreed the CFDS sessions provided valuable opportunities for skills development with teaching, leadership, wellness, diversity, equity, inclusion, and promotion.Conclusions Among clinical mentors, our novel coach approach to clinical faculty mentoring and skill-building had favorable effects on job satisfaction, knowledge of mentorship competencies, and confidence in coaching skills. Outcomes from the clinical faculty development series supported the mentoring program outcomes. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to determine how this program will impact mentees.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UW Health Sciences Human Subjects Committee determined that our evaluations did not meet the definition of human subjects research. They determined that the activities and analyses described in this report were considered quality assurance and declined to review them.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesOur data can be shared by request tot he corresponding author, however UW rule prohibit disclosure of information that might identify individual participants.CFDSClinical Faculty Development SeriesCFMPClinical Faculty Mentoring ProgramCTClinician-TeacherDEIDiversity, Equity and InclusionDOMDepartment of MedicineICFInternational Coaching FederationURiMUnderRepresented in MedicineUWUniversity of Wisconsin