PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Forkel, Stephanie J.
AU  - Friedrich, Patrick
AU  - de Schotten, Michel Thiebaut
AU  - Howells, Henrietta
TI  - White matter variability, cognition, and disorders: a systematic review
AID  - 10.1101/2020.04.22.20075127
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.04.22.20075127
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/25/2020.04.22.20075127.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/25/2020.04.22.20075127.full
AB  - Inter-individual differences can inform treatment procedures and - if accounted for - can significantly improve patient outcomes. However, when studying brain anatomy, these inter- individual variations are largely unaccounted for, despite reports of differences in gross anatomical features, cross-sectional and connectional anatomy. Brain connections are essential to mediate brain functional organisation and, when severed, cause functional impairments or complete loss of function. Hence the study of cerebral white matter may be an ideal compromise to capture inter-individual variability in structure and function. Here we reviewed the wealth of studies that associate functions and clinical symptoms with individual tracts using diffusion tractography. Our systematic review indicates that tractography has proven to be a sensitive method in neurology, psychiatry and healthy populations to identify variability and its functional correlates. However, the literature may be biased, as we identified that the most commonly reported tracts are not necessarily those with the highest sensitivity to cognitive functions and pathologies. Finally, we demonstrate that tracts, as we define them, are not usually correlated with only one, but rather multiple cognitive domains or pathologies. While our systematic review identified some methodological caveats, it also suggests that tract-function correlations might be a promising biomarker for precision medicine as it characterises variations in brain anatomy, differences in functional organisation and predict resilience or recovery in patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementEuropean Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement No. 818521Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is available online. https://github.com/StephForkel/PhenotypesReview.git