RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Gender Biases In Sports Concussions: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis into NCAA Female Athlete Symptom Presentation and Validity of the SCAT3 Checklist
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.03.04.24303608
DO 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303608
A1 Edelstein, Rachel
A1 Cushing, Sydney
A1 Schmidt, Karen M.
A1 Horn, John Darrell Van
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/08/2024.03.04.24303608.abstract
AB Background As a consequence of sports-related concussions, female athletes have been documented as reporting more symptoms than their male counterparts, in addition to incurring longer periods of recovery. However, the role of gender and its potential influence on symptom reporting and recovery outcomes in concussion management has not been completely explored.Study Design This study investigates potential differential item functioning (DIF) related to gender biases within the SCAT3 symptom severity checklist. The data was obtained from the Federal Interagency of Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR), which included information from the 2014-2017 NCAA and DoD CARE Consortium. A total of 1,258 NCAA athletes (n=473 females and n=785 males) SCAT3 Symptom Severity sub-scores were analyzed across five time points post-concussion: less than six hours post-injury, 24-48 hours post-injury, asymptomatic, unrestricted return to play, and at 6 months.Results During the recovery phase, women experienced more headaches, pressure in the head, and fatigue than male athletes. Overall, both male and female athletes had equivalent knowledge of concussions, and there was no significant difference in symptom-reporting ability for most items, including emotional-related symptoms. Only during the unrestricted return to play phase were group-level differences detected, with females being more likely to report more severe symptoms than males. However, upon further analysis, it was discovered females exhibit a relatively high difficulty level reporting symptom severity beyond ‘Mild’, therefore the group-level DIF may result from gender biases within the checklist.Conclusion The present analysis posits that Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in specific symptoms may lead to gender bias. The findings of this study reveal that female athletes tend to exhibit symptomatic behavior upon returning to play, a phenomenon consistent with prior research. However, the possible DIF may provoke biases due to unreliable reporting measures within the SCAT3 symptom severity checklist. Furthermore, explaining why recent literature reports that female athletes do not present as symptomatic upon return to play. Additional research is warranted to determine whether females genuinely experience more symptoms or whether the presence of these potential assessment gender biases obstructs the manifestation of asymptomatic recoveries.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.