RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Self-Other Voice Discrimination Task: A - Neuropsychological Tool For Clinical Assessment of Self-Related Deficits
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.03.04.24303420
DO 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303420
A1 Voruz, Philippe
A1 Orepic, Pavo
A1 Coll, Selim Yahia
A1 Haemmerli, Julien
A1 Blanke, Olaf
A1 Péron, Julie Anne
A1 Schaller, Karl
A1 Iannotti, Giannina Rita
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/07/2024.03.04.24303420.abstract
AB Background Deficits in self are commonly described through different neuro-pathologies, based on clinical evaluations and experimental paradigms. However, currently available approaches lack appropriate clinical validation, making objective evaluation and discrimination of self-related deficits challenging.Methods We applied a statistical standardized method to assess the clinical discriminatory role of a Self-Other Voice Discrimination (SOVD) task. This task, validated experimentally as a marker for self-related deficits, was administered to 17 patients eligible for neurosurgery due to focal hemispheric brain tumors or epileptic lesions.Results The clinical discriminatory capacity of the SOVD task was evident in three patients who exhibited impairments for self-voice perception that could not be predicted by other neuropsychological performances. Impairments in other-voice perception were linked to inhibitory neuropsychological alterations, suggesting a potential association with executive deficits in voice recognition.Conclusions This exploratory study highlights the clinical discriminatory potential of the SOVD task and suggests that it could complement the standard neuropsychological assessment, paving the way for enhanced diagnoses and tailored treatments for self-related deficits.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 320030_182497 to K.S.).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the national Commission Cantonal d’Ethique de la Recherche de Geneva (CCER, code approved protocol PB_2016-01635).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors