RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Generation of guideline-based clinical decision trees in oncology using large language models
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.03.04.24303737
DO 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303737
A1 Miao, Brenda Y.
A1 Almaraz, Eduardo Rodriguez
A1 Ganjouei, Amir Ashraf
A1 Suresh, Arvind
A1 Zack, Travis
A1 Bravo, Maxim
A1 Raghavendran, Srinidhi
A1 Oskotsky, Boris
A1 Alaa, Ahmed
A1 Butte, Atul J.
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/06/2024.03.04.24303737.abstract
AB Background Molecular biomarkers play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and treatment of oncologic diseases but staying updated with the latest guidelines and research can be challenging for healthcare professionals and patients. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as MedPalm-2 and GPT-4, have emerged as potential tools to streamline biomedical information extraction, but their ability to summarize molecular biomarkers for oncologic disease subtyping remains unclear. Auto-generation of clinical nomograms from text guidelines could illustrate a new type of utility for LLMs.Methods In this cross-sectional study, two LLMs, GPT-4 and Claude-2, were assessed for their ability to generate decision trees for molecular subtyping of oncologic diseases with and without expert-curated guidelines. Clinical evaluators assessed the accuracy of biomarker and cancer subtype generation, as well as validity of molecular subtyping decision trees across five cancer types: colorectal cancer, invasive ductal carcinoma, acute myeloid leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and diffuse glioma.Results Both GPT-4 and Claude-2 “off the shelf” successfully produced clinical decision trees that contained valid instances of biomarkers and disease subtypes. Overall, GPT-4 and Claude-2 showed limited improvement in the accuracy of decision tree generation when guideline text was added. A Streamlit dashboard was developed for interactive exploration of subtyping trees generated for other oncologic diseases.Conclusion This study demonstrates the potential of LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude-2 in aiding the summarization of molecular diagnostic guidelines in oncology. While effective in certain aspects, their performance highlights the need for careful interpretation, especially in zero-shot settings. Future research should focus on enhancing these models for more nuanced and probabilistic interpretations in clinical decision-making. The developed tools and methodologies present a promising avenue for expanding LLM applications in various medical specialties.Key Points- Large language models, such as GPT-4 and Claude-2, can generate clinical decision trees that summarize best-practice guidelines in oncology- Providing guidelines in the prompt query improves the accuracy of oncology biomarker and cancer subtype information extraction- However, providing guidelines in zero-shot settings does not significantly improve generation of clinical decision trees for either GPT-4 or Claude-2Competing Interest StatementAJB is a co-founder and consultant to Personalis and NuMedii; consultant to Samsung, Mango Tree Corporation, and in the recent past, 10x Genomics, Helix, Pathway Genomics, and Verinata (Illumina); has served on paid advisory panels or boards for Geisinger Health, Regenstrief Institute, Gerson Lehman Group, AlphaSights, Covance, Novartis, Genentech, and Merck, and Roche; is a shareholder in Personalis and NuMedii; is a minor shareholder in Apple, Facebook, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, Amazon, Snap, 10x Genomics, Illumina, CVS, Nuna Health, Assay Depot, Vet24seven, Regeneron, Sanofi, Royalty Pharma, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Biogen, Paraxel, and Sutro, and several other non-health related companies and mutual funds; and has received honoraria and travel reimbursement for invited talks from Johnson and Johnson, Roche, Genentech, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, Takeda, Varian, Mars, Siemens, Optum, Abbott, Celgene, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Westat, and many academic institutions, medical or disease specific foundations and associations, and health systems. Atul Butte receives royalty payments through Stanford University, for several patents and other disclosures licensed to NuMedii and Personalis. AJB's research has been funded by NIH, Peraton (as the prime on an NIH contract), Genentech, Johnson and Johnson, FDA, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Leon Lowenstein Foundation, Intervalien Foundation, Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg, the Barbara and Gerson Bakar Foundation, and in the recent past, the March of Dimes, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, L'Oreal, and Progenity. None of these organizations or companies had any influence or involvement in the development of this manuscript. All other authors report no conflict of interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of University of California, San Francisco waived ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll prompts and text guidelines used are referenced or provided in supplemental materials. All code used to generate and visualize the clinical trees can be found at https://github.com/BMiao10/clincial-decision-trees. The streamlit dashboard for exploration of decision trees for other values can be found at https://clinicaltrees.org/