RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Estimating the impact of COVID-19 control measures using a Bayesian model of physical distancing
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.17.20070086
DO 10.1101/2020.04.17.20070086
A1 Anderson, Sean C.
A1 Edwards, Andrew M.
A1 Yerlanov, Madi
A1 Mulberry, Nicola
A1 Stockdale, Jessica E.
A1 Iyaniwura, Sarafa A.
A1 Falcao, Rebeca C.
A1 Otterstatter, Michael C.
A1 Irvine, Michael A.
A1 Janjua, Naveed Z.
A1 Coombs, Daniel
A1 Colijn, Caroline
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/22/2020.04.17.20070086.abstract
AB Extensive physical distancing measures are currently the primary intervention against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide. It is therefore urgent to estimate the impact such measures are having. We introduce a Bayesian epidemiological model in which a proportion of individuals are willing and able to participate in distancing measures, with the timing of these measures informed by survey data on attitudes to distancing and COVID-19. We fit our model to reported COVID-19 cases in British Columbia, Canada, using an observation model that accounts for both underestimation and the delay between symptom onset and reporting. We estimate the impact that physical distancing (also known as social distancing) has had on the contact rate and examine the projected impact of relaxing distancing measures. We find that distancing has had a strong impact, consistent with declines in reported cases and in hospitalization and intensive care unit numbers. We estimate that approximately 0.78 (0.66–0.89 90% CI) of contacts have been removed for individuals in British Columbia practising physical distancing and that this fraction is above the threshold of 0.45 at which prevalence is expected to grow. However, relaxing distancing measures beyond this threshold re-starts rapid exponential growth. Because the extent of underestimation is unknown, the data are consistent with a wide range in the prevalence of COVID-19 in the population; changes to testing criteria over time introduce additional uncertainty. Our projections indicate that intermittent distancing measures—if sufficiently strong and robustly followed— could control COVID-19 transmission, but that if distancing measures are relaxed too much, the epidemic curve would grow to high prevalence.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementC.C. and J.S. are funded by the Federal Government of Canada's Canada 150 Research Chair program. We thank Fisheries and Oceans Canada for their support. This work was supported by funding from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health ResearchAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available publicly at links given in the manuscript. The analysis is reproducible with code at the github link below. https://github.com/carolinecolijn/distancing-impact-covid19