RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Associations between Monocyte-to-High Density Lipoprotein Ratio and abdominal aortic calcification: Results of a nationwide survey
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.27.24303475
DO 10.1101/2024.02.27.24303475
A1 Ran, Wei
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/29/2024.02.27.24303475.abstract
AB Background Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), a critical marker for cardiovascular disease, is strongly correlated with metabolic disorders like diabetes and hypertension. Recent studies have highlighted the Monocyte-to-High Density Lipoprotein Ratio (MHR) as a potential biomarker for assessing the risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases.Methods and Results This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2013-2014, focusing on U.S. adults aged 40 years and above. A total of 3017 participants were included, with AAC evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, and the severity of AAC quantified based on the Kauppila score system. MHR was investigated for its association with AAC severity, employing multiple linear and multivariable logistic regression models to explore the relationship dynamics. After adjusting for potential confounders, including age, sex, race, socioeconomic factors, and other health-related variables, the analysis revealed a significant association between higher MHR levels and increased AAC scores. Participants with elevated MHR exhibited a greater prevalence and severity of AAC.Conclusions The study demonstrates a significant association between elevated MHR and the prevalence and severity of AAC, suggesting the utility of MHR as a predictive biomarker for cardiovascular risk assessment. These findings advocate for the inclusion of MHR in cardiovascular disease management and risk stratification protocols.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis study is a retrospective analysis using data extracted from an existing database and does not constitute a prospective interventional study. Therefore, it was not subject to registration in a clinical trial registry. Our research utilized publicly available datasets, analyzing them within the scope of observational research, which does not require pre-registration in databases like ClinicalTrials.gov. This approach is consistent with guidelines for studies of this nature, where the primary aim is to analyze existing data rather than to initiate new interventions or clinical trialsFunding StatementnoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB Protocol Number: 2016-09-8292 IRB Approval Date: September 14, 2016 IRB Expiration Date: September 13, 2017I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data underpinning the findings presented in this manuscript are derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2013 to 2014. The NHANES is a public domain resource managed by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), which conducts these surveys in 2-year cycles to assess the health and nutritional status of the non-institutionalized U.S. population. As such, the data utilized for our study are publicly accessible and can be obtained directly from the NHANES website at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/. This includes comprehensive datasets on abdominal artery calcification, dietary inflammatory index, and other relevant health metrics considered in our analysis. Our study's specific data subset, criteria for inclusion, and the analytical approach are detailed within the Methods section of our manuscript for reproducibility and transparency.