RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessment of Technical Efficiency in the Moroccan Public Hospital Network: Using the DEA Method
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.22.24303214
DO 10.1101/2024.02.22.24303214
A1 Youssef, Er-Rays
A1 Meriem, M’dioud
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/29/2024.02.22.24303214.abstract
AB Background The public hospital network in Morocco plays a crucial role in providing healthcare services. However, this network faces challenges in terms of technical efficiency in healthcare management.Objectives This study aimed to assess the technical efficiency of the public hospital network in Morocco.Methods This article compares the efficiency of 77 public hospital networks from 2017 to 2020. Data were collected from the Directorate of Planning and Financial Resources (DPFR) of the Health Ministry Marocco. The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method was employed, using three inputs (Hospital, Physician and Paramedical) and four outputs (Functional capacity, Hospitalization days and Admission). Additionally, the Malmquist index (MI) is utilized to analyse the factors of production, and peer modelling is incorporated to address hospital inefficiency.Results The average technical efficiency of public hospital networks under the CRS hypothesis from 2017 to 2020 is 0.697 (71% of DMUs have a score lower than 1), indicating that these networks need to minimize their inputs by approximately 30.3%. The Malmquist index reveals a decline in productivity gain from 2017/2018 (score of 0.980) followed by improvement in 2018/2019 (score of 1.163). In terms of peer modelling, 72.7% of the DMUs should emulate the most effective DMUs beginning in 2020, whereas the lowest score was observed in 2019.Conclusion These findings highlight the need for the public hospital network in Morocco to enhance the effective and efficient utilization of inputs, such as the number of hospitals and medical and paramedical staff, to produce the same outputs, including the number of surgical procedures, hospitalization days, admissions, and functional capacity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscriptCRSTEConstant return to scale technicalDEAData Envelopment AnalysisDEAPData Envelopment Analysis ProgrammingDMUDecision Making UnitIMIndex MalmquistEffchTechnical Efficiency ChangeETTechnical EfficiencypechPure ChangePHNPublic Hospital NetworksPHNP/PProvincial or Prefectural Public Hospital NetworksSEScale EfficiencysechScale ChangeTechchTechnology ChangeTFPTotals Factors ProductiontfpchTotals Factors ProductivityVRSTEVariable return to scale technical efficiency