RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Variation in Aerosol Production Across Oxygen Delivery Devices in Spontaneously Breathing Human Subjects
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.15.20066688
DO 10.1101/2020.04.15.20066688
A1 Iwashyna, Theodore J.
A1 Boehman, Andre
A1 Capecelatro, Jesse
A1 Cohn, Amy M.
A1 Cooke, James M.
A1 Costa, Deena Kelly
A1 Eakin, Richard M.
A1 Prescott, Hallie C.
A1 Woolridge, Margaret S.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/20/2020.04.15.20066688.abstract
AB We sought to assess whether HHFNC results in greater production of aerosolized particles than 6 liters per minute nasal cannula, using state-of-the-art techniques of aerosol measurement, in spontaneously breathing human volunteers in a simulated hospital room.For each volunteer, we first measured background aerosol levels in the room immediately prior to testing. We then measured aerosol levels while the healthy volunteer laid in bed - - with the head of bed at 30 degrees - - wearing the following oxygen delivery devices: (a) 6L/min nasal canula (NC) with humidification; (b) non-re-breather mask (NRB) with 15L/min gas flow, non-humidified; (c) HHFNC with 30L/min gas flow; (d) HHFNC with 60L/min gas flow. Two scanning mobility particle sizing (SMPS) systems (TSI 3080/3030, TSI 3080/3750) were used to measure aerosols 10 to 500 nanometer (nm) in size for each of the oxygen delivery devices.There was no variation in aerosol level within patients between room air, 6 L/min NC, 15 L/min NRB, 30 L/min HHFNC, and 60 L/min HHFNC, regardless of coughing.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot a clinical trialFunding StatementFunding: None. This material is the result of work supported with resources and use of facilities at the Ann Arbor VA Medical Center.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be provided to potential collaborators.