RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The impact of early scientific literature in response to COVID-19: a scientometric perspective
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.15.20066183
DO 10.1101/2020.04.15.20066183
A1 Golinelli, Davide
A1 Nuzzolese, Andrea Giovanni
A1 Boetto, Erik
A1 Rallo, Flavia
A1 Greco, Manfredi
A1 Toscano, Fabrizio
A1 Fantini, Maria Pia
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/18/2020.04.15.20066183.abstract
AB Background In the early phases of a new pandemic, identifying the most relevant evidence and quantifying which studies are shared the most can help researchers and policy makers. The aim of this study is to describe and quantify the impact of early scientific production in response to COVID-19 pandemic.Methods The study consisted of: 1) review of the scientific literature produced in the first 30 days since the first COVID-19 paper was published; 2) analysis of papers’ metrics with the construction of a “Computed-Impact-Score” (CIS) that represents a unifying score over heterogeneous bibliometric indicators. In this study we use metrics and alternative metrics collected into five separate categories. On top of those categories we compute the CIS. Highest CIS papers are further analyzed.Results 239 papers have been included in the study. The mean of citations, mentions and social media interactions resulted in 1.63, 10 and 1250, respectively. The paper with highest CIS resulted “Clinical features of patients[…]” by Chaolin Huang et al., which rated first also in citations and mentions. This is the first paper describing patients affected by the new disease and reporting data that are clearly of great interest to both the scientific community and the general population.Conclusions The early response of scientific literature during an epidemic does not follow a pre-established pattern. Being able to monitor how communications spread from the scientific world toward the general population using both traditional and alternative metric measures is essential, especially in the early stages of a pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study received no fundingAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAvailable upon request to the Authors