RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Cross Border Population Movement Patterns, Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda, November 2022
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.16.24302786
DO 10.1101/2024.02.16.24302786
A1 King, Patrick
A1 Wanyana, Mercy Wendy
A1 Mayinja, Harriet
A1 Simbwa, Brenda Nakafeero
A1 Zalwango, Marie Gorreti
A1 Kobusinge, Joyce Owens
A1 Migisha, Richard
A1 Kadobera, Daniel
A1 Kwesiga, Benon
A1 Bulage, Lilian
A1 Gonahasa, Doreen
A1 Ahabwe, Peter Babigumira
A1 Nchoko, Serah
A1 Salat, Edna
A1 Weithaka, Freshia
A1 Gunya, Oscar
A1 Odhiambo, Fredrick
A1 Mutabazi, Vincent
A1 Habimana, Metuschelah
A1 Twagirimana, Gabriel
A1 Ndabarinze, Ezechiel
A1 Manishimwe, Alexis
A1 Itiakorit, Harriet
A1 Kadivani, Samuel
A1 Seib, Katy
A1 Whitney, Ellen
A1 Ario, Alex Riolexus
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/20/2024.02.16.24302786.abstract
AB Background The frequent population movement across the five East African Countries poses risk of disease spread in the region. A clear understanding of population movement patterns is critical for informing cross-border disease control interventions.We assessed population mobility patterns across the borders of the East African states of Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda.Methods In November 2022, we conducted Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), and participatory mapping. Participants were selected using purposive sampling and a topic guide used during interviews. Key informants included border districts (Uganda and Rwanda) and county health officials (Kenya). FGD participants were identified from border communities and travellers and these included truck drivers, commercial motorcyclists, and businesspersons. During KIIs and FGDs, we conducted participatory mapping using Population Connectivity Across Borders toolkits. Data were analysed using grounded theory approach using Atlas ti 7 software.Results Different age groups travelled across borders for various reasons. Younger age groups travelled across the border for education, trade, social reasons, employment opportunities, agriculture and mining. While older age groups mainly travelled for healthcare and social reasons. Other common reasons for crossing the borders included religious and cultural matters. Respondents reported seasonal variations in the volume of travellers. Respondents reported using both official (4 Kenya-Uganda, 5 Rwanda-Uganda borders) and unofficial Points of Entry (PoEs) (14 Kenya-Uganda, 20 Uganda-Rwanda) for exit and entry movements on borders. Unofficial PoEs were preferred because they had fewer restrictions like the absence of health screening, and immigration and customs checks. Key destination points (points of interest) included: markets, health facilities, places of worship, education institutions, recreational facilities and business towns. Twenty-eight health facilities (10- Lwakhakha, Uganda, 10- Lwakhakha, Kenya, and 8- Cyanika, Uganda) along the borders were the most commonly visited by the travellers and border communities.Conclusion Complex population movement and connectivity patterns were identified along the borders. These were used to guide cross-border disease surveillance and other border health strategies in the three countries. Findings were used to revise district response and preparedness plans by strengthening community-based surveillance in border communities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe project was supported by the International Association of National Public Health Institutes (IANPHI), Uganda National Institute of Public Health, and the United States Centres for Disease Control and prevention grant number NU14GH001238. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the US-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the department of health and human services, Makerere University school of Public Health or the Ministry of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Office of the Associate Director for Science at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined that this study was not a human subject study with the primary intent of guiding public health planning and practice. This activity was reviewed by United States Centers for Disease Control and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and Centers for Disease Control policy.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets upon which our findings are based belong to the Uganda Ministry of Health and Uganda National Institute of Public Health. They are publicly available upon request from the Uganda National Institute of Public Health.COVID-19Corona Virus DiseaseDSFPDistrict Surveillance Focal personPoEPoint of EntryWHOWorld Health OrganizationUCVIPUganda COVID-19 Vaccination Implementation Plan