RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Preference for Social Motion in Autistic Adults
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.14.24302687
DO 10.1101/2024.02.14.24302687
A1 Matyjek, Magdalena
A1 Bast, Nico
A1 Faraco, Salvador Soto
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/17/2024.02.14.24302687.abstract
AB Autism is often linked to attenuated social attention, including a lowered looking preference to biological motion in autistic compared to non-autistic children. This looking preference has been suggested as an autism marker in childhood. However, few studies have investigated whether this bias persists into adulthood. Furthermore, the underlying cognitive mechanism of this group difference is largely unknown. Pupillary responses have been established as an index of salience processing and are thus a promising measurement of the cognitive bases of looking preference. The present study examined differences in looking preference and pupillary responses to social versus geometric motion between autistic and non-autistic adults (N=66). In terms of preference, autistic adults demonstrated a reduced spontaneous looking toward social stimuli compared to the non-autistic group. Whereas the former displayed no clear preference for either motion type, the latter showed a strong preference for social motion. In terms of pupillary responses, the autistic group showed faster and larger pupil dilation for social motion compared to the non-autistic group, consistent with heightened cognitive effort. These results suggest persistent differences in social attention across the developmental lifespan in autism.LAY SUMMARY Autism is often associated with differences in social attention, and how much autistic children look at social motion (moving human faces) over non-social motion (geometric shapes) could be applied to screen and prioritise potentially autistic persons for diagnosis and support services. Our study investigated whether these differences persist into adulthood. We found that adult autistic participants spontaneously looked less at video-clips containing social motion compared to their non-autistic counterparts, and showed faster and larger pupillary responses to social motion, which could be an indication of increased cognitive effort in interpreting social information. These findings suggest that the lowered social motion preference in autism persists across lifespan.Competing Interest StatementNB receives royalties for lecturing at institutes for training in psychotherapy and receives research funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG). The authors declare no further competing (financial or otherwise) interests.Funding StatementThis project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no 945380, Agencia Estatal de Investigacion grant PID2019-108531GB-I00 AEI/FEDER, and AGAUR Generalitat de Catalunya grant 2021 SGR 00911.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The protocol and data handling received approval of the Institutional Committee for Ethical Review of Projects at Universitat Pompeu Fabra (CIREP-UPF).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data and analysis code will be made publicly available upon publication at https://osf.io/nc7xm/. https://osf.io/nc7xm/