RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The association between the value of a statistical life and frailty in Burkina Faso
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.10.24302634
DO 10.1101/2024.02.10.24302634
A1 Freidoony, Leila
A1 Goodman-Palmer, Dina
A1 Barker, Fred
A1 Bountogo, Mamadou
A1 Geldsetzer, Pascal
A1 Harling, Guy
A1 Hirschhorn, Lisa
A1 Manne-Goehler, Jennifer
A1 Siedner, Mark
A1 Trautmann, Stefan
A1 Xu, Yilong
A1 Witham, Miles
A1 Davies, Justine
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/13/2024.02.10.24302634.abstract
AB Background To ensure resources invested into services are commensurate with benefit, economists utilise various methods to assess value of life. Understanding the performance of these methods in older populations is crucial, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), where the majority of older people will live by 2030. Value of Statistical Life Years (VSLY) is widely used in cost-benefit analyses but rarely been in LMICs or in older people.Objective This study aimed to investigate the hypothesis that frailty would be associated with a lower VSLY in participants in rural Burkina Faso, when controlling for factors found in other studies likely to affect VSLY, such as socio-demographics, multimorbidity, quality of life, and disability.Methods The study included 3,988 adults aged 40 years and older from a population-representative household survey done in Nouna, Burkina Faso. Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, chronic medical conditions, quality of life, disability, physical performance, and VSLY. Frailty status was derived using Fried’s frailty phenotype. Bivariate analyses investigated the association between quintiles of VSLY and frailty. To explore modification of associations by other variables, we built sequential binary logistic regression models comparing each quintile of VSLY with the first (lowest) quintile. Models included frailty category, age, sex, marital status, educational attainment, and wealth. We sequentially added quality of life, multimorbidity, and disability.Results Of 2,761 survey participants included in this analysis, 51.4% were female. Average age was 54.5 years (with 70.0% aged 40-59 years), 24.8% of respondents reported being alone, and 84.5% had not completed education. In bivariate analyses, we found a significant negative association between higher VSLY and frailty, increasing age, disability, and quality of life. Conversely, being male, married, and educated were positively associated with higher VSLY. The negative association between VSLY and frailty remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, education, wealth, quality of life, disability, and multimorbidity (odds of being frail for VSLY quintile 5 vs quintile 1 was 0.48, 95% CI 0.37-0.64 for the fully adjusted model). Furthermore, effect of age, education, and wealth on VSLY became non-significant once frailty was included in the model.Conclusion There is a strong relationship between the value that older people place on their lives and their frailty status. Frailty status is important to consider when assessing VSLY, especially in LMICs in which there is a rapidly growing older population.Key Points for Decision MakersThis study explores the relationship between frailty and the Value of Statistical Life Years (VSLY) in older adults in rural Burkina Faso, representing the first such investigation in any setting.The research reveals a strong and significant association between frailty and lower VSLY, even after adjusting for variables like age, multimorbidity, and quality of life.These findings emphasize the importance of considering frailty status in the application of VSLY in cost-benefit analyses, particularly for interventions targeting older adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for the study was provided by the Alexander Von Humboldt Foundation, Germany and the Institute for Global Innovation, University of Birmingham, UK. G.H. is supported by a fellowship from the Wellcome Trust and Royal Society [grant number 210479/Z/18/Z].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from Ethics Commission I of the medical faculty Heidelberg (S-120/2018), the Burkina Faso Comite d'Ethique pour la Recherche en Sante in Ouagadougou (2018-4-045) and the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Centre de Recherche en Sante de Nouna (2018-04).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.List of abbreviationsVSLYValue of Statistical Life YearsLMICsLow- and Middle-Income CountriesMMMultimorbidityQOLQuality Of LifeDASDisability Assessment Schedule