RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A systematic review protocol for estimation of the prevalence of depression using diagnostic instruments in the elderly population in India, 2000-2019
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.10.20060871
DO 10.1101/2020.04.10.20060871
A1 Behera, Priyamadhaba
A1 Pilania, Manju
A1 Yadav, Vikas
A1 Bairwa, Mohan
A1 Dabar, Deepti
A1 Behera, Surama Manjari
A1 Poongothai, S.
A1 Mohan, Viswanathan
A1 Dutt Gupta, Shiv
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/15/2020.04.10.20060871.abstract
AB Introduction Depression is a common mental disorder in the elderly population, which significantly impacts their quality of life. However, correct estimates of its magnitude are not available in the elderly in India. The present systematic review and meta-analysis would attempt to estimate the prevalence of depression using diagnostic instruments among elderly persons aged 60 years and above.Methods and analysis Searches will be performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Community-based cross-sectional and cohort studies (2001 – 9/2019) reporting the prevalence of depression in the elderly; using diagnostic instruments will be included. Studies conducted among chronic disease patients, in-hospital patients, and special groups such as with disaster-stricken populations, and studies reporting the only 1 or 2 subcategories of depression, will be excluded. Disagreements in study selection and data abstraction will be resolved by consensus and arbitration by a third reviewer. AXIS critical appraisal tool will be used for quality assessment of individual studies. Findings of eligible studies will be pooled using fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis whichever is appropriate. Heterogeneity between studies will be examined by Cochran’s Q test and quantified by I2 statistic. A cumulative meta-analysis will be used to detect temporal trends in the prevalence of depression and the effect of poor-quality studies on the pooled estimate. Publication bias will be assessed by visual inspection of funnel plots and the Egger test.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval will be needed because it will be a systematic review. Data from previously published studies will be retrieved and analyzed. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication in a scientific journal and conferences.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019138453.Strengths and limitations of this studyIt is a first-ever systematic review of depression prevalence in India based on diagnostic instruments only.Meta-analytic techniques such as cumulative meta-analysis, leave-one-out (jack-knife estimation) meta-analysis, and meta-regression will enrich the analysis and provide the estimate of prevalence nearer to the population estimate.A comprehensive synthesis of all available depression prevalence data in India using a standardized risk of bias tool.The protocol adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines.Heterogeneity in methodologies, such as diagnostic criteria, study duration, sampling design, and study locations may limit comparison across studies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNilAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNot applicableGDPGross Domestic Product