RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Frequency of lipoprotein(a) testing and its levels in Pakistani population
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.09.24302487
DO 10.1101/2024.02.09.24302487
A1 Batool, Hijab
A1 Khan, Madeeha
A1 Ain, Quratul
A1 Chughtai, Omar R.
A1 Khan, Muhammad D.
A1 Khan, Mohammad I.
A1 Sadiq, Fouzia
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/11/2024.02.09.24302487.abstract
AB Background Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a highly atherogenic particle identified as an independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aimed to investigate the frequency of Lp(a) testing and incidence of elevated Lp(a) in the Pakistani population.Methods For this observational study, Lp(a) and lipid profile data from five years (June 2015 to October 2020) were acquired from the electronic patient records of a diagnostic laboratory (Chughtai Laboratories, Lahore). The association of age, total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-HDL, and triglyceride (TG) levels with two thresholds for Lp(a), that is, <30 mg/dL and ≥30 mg/dL, was calculated using the Kruskal Wallis test, while the association between Lp(a) levels and lipid variables was calculated using Spearman correlation.Results For five years, 1060 tests were conducted, averaging 212 tests per year. Of these tests, 37.2% showed Lp(a) levels above 30 mg/dL. There were no significant differences observed in the results between males and females. However, younger individuals displayed significantly higher Lp(a) levels. Additionally, there was only a weak correlation between Lp(a) levels and other lipid variables.Conclusion Despite being recognized as a risk factor for ASCVD in the Pakistani population, only a small proportion of the large population had their Lp(a) tested. Moreover, a significant proportion of the population lies above the threshold.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Institutional Review Board (CIP/IRB/1184).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors