PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - White, Basel AU - Harrow, Amy AU - Cinelli, Christina AU - Batchelder, Kendra AU - Khalil, Andre TI - WAVELET-BASED AUTOMATIC PECTORAL MUSCLE SEGMENTATION FOR MAMMOGRAMS AID - 10.1101/2024.02.09.24302580 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.02.09.24302580 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/11/2024.02.09.24302580.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/11/2024.02.09.24302580.full AB - The computational analysis to assist radiologists in the interpretation of mammograms usually requires a pre-processing step where the image is converted into a black and white mask to separate breast tissue from the pectoral muscle and the image background. The manual delineation of the breast tissue from the mammogram image is subjective and time-consuming. The 2D Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima (WTMM) segmentation method, a powerful and versatile multi-scale edge detection approach, is adapted and presented as a novel automated breast tissue segmentation method. The algorithm computes the local maxima of the modulus of the continuous Gaussian wavelet transform to produce candidate edge detection lines called maxima chains. These maxima chains from multiple wavelet scales are optimally sorted to produce a breast tissue segmentation mask. The mammographic mask is quantitatively compared to a manual delineation using the Dice-Sorenson Coefficient (DSC). The adaptation of the 2D WTMM segmentation method produces a median DSC of 0.9763 on 1042 mediolateral oblique (MLO) 2D Full Field Digital mammographic views from 82 patients obtained from the MaineHealth Biobank (Scarborough, Maine, USA). Our proposed approach is evaluated against OpenBreast, an open-source automated analysis software in MATLAB, through comparing each approach’s masks to the manual delineations. OpenBreast produces a lower median DSC of 0.9710. To determine statistical significance, the analysis is restricted to 82 mammograms (one randomly chosen per patient), which yields DSC medians of 0.9756 for the WTMM approach vs. 0.9698 for OpenBreast (p-value = 0.0067 using a paired Wilcoxon Rank Sum test). Thus, the 2D WTMM segmentation method can reliably delineate the pectoral muscle and produce an accurate segmentation of whole breast tissue in mammograms.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this manuscript was partially supported by National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number R15CA246335. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. BW acknowledges financial support from the University of Maine Center for Undergraduate Research and the Honors College.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of MaineHealth waived ethical approval for this work due to the de-identified nature of the data. The IRB approval number is #4664 and was received in 2015.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe authors will make the data available upon reasonable request.