PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jing, Qin-Long AU - Liu, Ming-Jin AU - Yuan, Jun AU - Zhang, Zhou-Bin AU - Zhang, An-Ran AU - Dean, Natalie E. AU - Luo, Lei AU - Ma, Mengmeng AU - Longini, Ira AU - Kenah, Eben AU - Lu, Ying AU - Ma, Yu AU - Jalali, Neda AU - Fang, Li-Qun AU - Yang, Zhi-Cong AU - Yang, Yang TI - Household Secondary Attack Rate of COVID-19 and Associated Determinants AID - 10.1101/2020.04.11.20056010 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.04.11.20056010 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/15/2020.04.11.20056010.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/15/2020.04.11.20056010.full AB - Background As of April 2, 2020, the global reported number of COVID-19 cases has crossed over 1 million with more than 55,000 deaths. The household transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2, the causative pathogen, remains elusive.Methods Based on a comprehensive contact-tracing dataset from Guangzhou, we estimated both the population-level effective reproductive number and individual-level secondary attack rate (SAR) in the household setting. We assessed age effects on transmissibility and the infectivity of COVID-19 cases during their incubation period.Results A total of 195 unrelated clusters with 212 primary cases, 137 nonprimary (secondary or tertiary) cases and 1938 uninfected close contacts were traced. We estimated the household SAR to be 13.8% (95% CI: 11.1-17.0%) if household contacts are defined as all close relatives and 19.3% (95% CI: 15.5-23.9%) if household contacts only include those at the same residential address as the cases, assuming a mean incubation period of 4 days and a maximum infectious period of 13 days. The odds of infection among children (<20 years old) was only 0.26 (95% CI: 0.13-0.54) times of that among the elderly (≥60 years old). There was no gender difference in the risk of infection. COVID-19 cases were at least as infectious during their incubation period as during their illness. On average, a COVID-19 case infected 0.48 (95% CI: 0.39-0.58) close contacts. Had isolation not been implemented, this number increases to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.51-0.75). The effective reproductive number in Guangzhou dropped from above 1 to below 0.5 in about 1 week.Conclusion SARS-CoV-2 is more transmissible in households than SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and the elderly ≥60 years old are the most vulnerable to household transmission. Case finding and isolation alone may be inadequate to contain the pandemic and need to be used in conjunction with heightened restriction of human movement as implemented in Guangzhou.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by grants from the U.S. National Institute of Health (R01 AI139761 and R01 AI116770), the Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangzhou (201804010121), the Project for Key Medicine Discipline Construction of Guangzhou Municipality (2017-2019-04), and the Key research and development program of China (2019YFC1200604).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData sharing requests should be sent to Guangzhou Municipal CDC.