RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Social inequalities in pregnancy metabolic profile: findings from the multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.08.24302335
DO 10.1101/2024.02.08.24302335
A1 Elhakeem, Ahmed
A1 Clayton, Gemma L
A1 Soares, Ana G
A1 Taylor, Kurt
A1 Maitre, Léa
A1 Santorelli, Gillian
A1 Wright, John
A1 Lawlor, Deborah A
A1 Vrijheid, Martine
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/08/2024.02.08.24302335.abstract
AB Background Lower socioeconomic position (SEP) is associated with adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes and with less favourable metabolic profile in nonpregnant adults. However, socioeconomic differences in pregnancy metabolic profile are unknown. We investigated association between a composite measure of SEP and pregnancy metabolic profile in White European (WE) and South Asian (SA) women.Methods We included 3,905 WE and 4,404 SA pregnant women from a population-based UK cohort. Latent class analysis was applied to nineteen individual, household, and area-based SEP indicators (collected by questionnaires or linkage to residential address) to derive a composite SEP latent variable. Targeted nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to determine 148 metabolic traits from mid-pregnancy serum samples. Associations between SEP and metabolic traits were examined using linear regressions adjusted for gestational age and weighted by latent class probabilities. An interactive application was developed for exploring all association results (https://aelhak.shinyapps.io/SEP_NMR_BiB/).Results Five SEP sub-groups were identified and labelled ‘Highest SEP’ (48% WE and 52% SA), ‘High-Medium SEP’ (77% and 23%), ‘Medium SEP’ (56% and 44%) ‘Low-Medium SEP’ (21% and 79%), and ‘Lowest SEP’ (52% and 48%). Lower SEP was associated with more adverse levels of 113 metabolic traits, including lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and higher triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) traits. For example, mean standardized difference (95%CI) in concentration of small VLDL particles (vs. Highest SEP) was 0.12 standard deviation (SD) units (0.05 to 0.20) for ‘Medium SEP’ and 0.25SD (0.18 to 0.32) for ‘Lowest SEP’. There was statistical evidence of ethnic differences in associations of SEP with 31 traits, primarily characterised by stronger associations in WE women e.g., mean difference in HDL cholesterol in WE and SA women respectively (vs. Highest-SEP) was - 0.30SD (−0.41 to −0.20) and −0.16SD (−0.27 to −0.05) for ‘Medium SEP’, and −0.62SD (−0.72 to −0.52) and −0.29SD (−0.40 to −0.20) for ‘Lowest SEP’.Conclusions We found widespread socioeconomic differences in metabolic traits in pregnant WE and SA women residing in the UK, and clearer socioeconomic gradient for some traits in WE women. Supporting all pregnant women in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic groups may provide the greatest benefit for perinatal health.Competing Interest StatementDAL reported grants from national and international government and charity funders, Roche Diagnostics, and Medtronic Ltd for work unrelated to this publication. DAL also declares that she is an editor for BMC Medicine. The other authors report no conflicts.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/xrf8s/ Funding StatementThis project has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements No. 874583 (ATHLETE) and No. 874739 (LongITools). AE received part of his salary from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101021566 (ART-HEALTH). AE, GLC, AGS, KT, and DAL work in a unit that is supported by the University of Bristol and UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/6). BiB has received funding from the Wellcome Trust (101597) a joint grant from the UK Medical Research Council and UK Economic and Social Science Research Council (MR/N024391/1) and a British Heart Foundation Clinical Study grant (CS/16/4/32482). ISGlobal acknowledges support from the grant CEX2018-000806-S funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033, and support from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study management analysis and interpretation of data preparation review or approval of the manuscript and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Born In Bradford study had ethical approval from Bradford Research Ethics Committee (07/H1302/112), YFS: Hospital District of Southwest Finland (ETMK:68/1801/2017). All Born In Bradford sudy participants provided informed consent or assent to participate in the study and secondary data analyses.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data used during the current study are available to researchers by request from the Born In Bradford Executive GroupBiBBorn in BradfordIMDIndex of Multiple DeprivationLCALatent class analysisNMRNuclear Magnetic ResonanceSEPSocioeconomic position