RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Association Between Dietary Changes to Lose Weight and Mental Health Status in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2006
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.01.24302138
DO 10.1101/2024.02.01.24302138
A1 Min, Jihyun Jane
A1 Noh, Keeyoon
A1 Nam, Sojeong
A1 Ellison-Barnes, Alejandra
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/03/2024.02.01.24302138.abstract
AB Background Weight loss is a common endeavor taken by millions of residents annually in the U.S.—a country with a 31% overweight and 42% obesity rate. Weight loss is associated with numerous physical health benefits, such as better cardiovascular health. However, unhealthy weight loss strategies can cause adverse mental health effects. Past research has focused on how weight loss strategies affect the mental health of a general population—rather than those who are trying to lose weight—or has investigated a diverse array of weight loss strategies. This paper explores how dietary changes for weight loss are associated with mental health, specifically through several variables used in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9), which measures depression severity. We hypothesize that eating less and skipping meals will be associated with poorer mental health status, while eating fewer carbohydrates, eating less fat, and drinking more water will be associated with better mental health status.Methods and Findings This study uses the U.S. 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005. Univariate (descriptive statistics), bivariate (correlation coefficient), and multivariate (ordinal logistic regression) analyses were performed. The main results show that ‘skipped meals’ was positively associated with ‘feeling bad about yourself,’ ‘feeling down, depressed, or hopeless,’ and ‘little interest in doing things.’ ‘Ate fewer carbohydrates’ was negatively associated with the ‘little interest in doing things.’Conclusion Differing dietary changes used for weight loss, particularly skipping meals and eating fewer carbohydrates, are associated with differences in mental health status. Health care professionals providing weight loss guidance should be cognizant of patients’ baseline mental health and the potential for changes in mental health with different dietary strategies. Future research employing a longitudinal approach to determine whether there is evidence of a causal relationship between these and other dietary strategies and subsequent mental health outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementJohns Hopkins University (JHU) provides funding for corresponding authors who are affiliated with JHU to publish in PLOS Global Public Health for free.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was acknowledged by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board as Not Human Subjects Research (IRB00404102).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll protocols were reviewed and approved by the NCHS Ethics Review Board with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects before NHANES was implemented (32). Furthermore, this study was acknowledged by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board as Not Human Subjects Research (IRB00404102) and as a Quality Improvement project. Formal consent was not obtained as the dataset had all patient identifiers removed. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2005