RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Cardiovascular Disease Events in Adults with a History of State Care in Childhood: Pooling of Unpublished Results from 9 Cohort Studies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.26.24301814
DO 10.1101/2024.01.26.24301814
A1 Batty, G. David
A1 Kivimäki, Mika
A1 Almquist, Ylva B
A1 Eriksson, Johan G.
A1 Gissler, Mika
A1 Gnanamanickam, Emmanuel S
A1 Hamer, Mark
A1 Jackisch, Josephine
A1 Juon, Hee-Soon
A1 Keski-Säntti, Markus
A1 Li, Chaiquan
A1 Mikkola, Tuija M.
A1 Murray, Emily
A1 Sacker, Amanda
A1 Segal, Leonie
A1 Frank, Philipp
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/27/2024.01.26.24301814.abstract
AB Background Individuals who were separated from their biological family and placed into the care of the state during childhood (out-of-home care) are more prone to developing selected physical and mental health problems in adulthood, however, their risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is uncertain. Accordingly, we pooled published and unpublished results from cohort studies of childhood care and adult CVD.Methods We used two approaches to identifying relevant data on childhood care and adult CVD (PROSPERO registration CRD42021254665). First, to locate published studies, we searched PubMed (Medline) until November 2023. Second, with the aim of identifying unpublished studies with the potential to address the present research question, we scrutinised retrieved reviews of the impact of childhood state care on related adult health outcomes. All included studies were required to have prospective measurement of state care in childhood and a follow-up of CVD events in adulthood as the primary outcome (incident coronary heart disease and/or stroke). Collaborating investigators provided study-specific estimates which were aggregated using random-effects meta-analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess individual study quality.Findings Thirteen studies (2 published, 11 unpublished) met the inclusion criteria, and investigators from nine provided viable results, including updated analyses of the published studies. Studies comprised 611,601 individuals (301,129 women) from the US, UK, Sweden, Finland, and Australia. Relative to the unexposed, individuals with a care placement during childhood had a 50% greater risk of CVD in adulthood (summary rate ratio after basic adjustment [95% confidence interval]: 1.50 [1.22, 1.84]); range of study-specific estimates: 1.28 to 2.06; I2 = 69%, p = 0.001). This association was attenuated but persisted after multivariable adjustment for socioeconomic status in childhood (8 studies; 1.41 [1.15, 1.72]) and adulthood (9 studies, 1.28 [1.10, 1.50]). There was a suggestion of a stronger state care-CVD association in women.Interpretation Our findings show that individuals with experience of state care in childhood have a moderately raised risk of CVD in adulthood. For timely prevention, clinicians and policy makers should be aware that people with a care history may need additional attention in risk factor management.Evidence before this study There is growing evidence that individuals who were separated from their biological family and placed into the care of the state during childhood (out-of-home care) are more prone to developing selected physical and mental ill-health in adulthood, however, their risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events is uncertain. A search of electronic databases to November 2023 yielded only 2 relevant published studies and these had discordant findings.Added value of this study By scrutinising retrieved reviews of the impact of childhood state care on broadly related adult health outcomes, we identified studies with the potential to examine the association between childhood care and adult CVD events. Investigators from 7 provided these previously unpublished results and, on aggregating them alongside updated analyses from the 2 published studies, we found that, relative to their unexposed peers, adults with experience of state care earlier in life had a 50% greater risk of CVD. There was evidence that this relationship was partially mediating by socioeconomic status in adulthood, and there was a suggestion of a stronger state care–CVD association in women.Implications of all the available evidence This meta-analysis suggests that, alongside the array of well-document unfavourable social, behavioural, and health outcomes in adulthood, children experiencing state care may additionally have a higher burden of later CVD. For timely prevention, clinicians and policy makers should be aware that people with a care history may need additional attention in risk factor management.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialN/AFunding StatementThe present paper received no direct funding. GDB is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/P023444/1) and the US National Institute on Aging (1R56AG052519-01; 1R01AG052519-01A1); MK by the Wellcome Trust (221854/Z/20/Z), the MRC (R024227, S011676, Y014154), NIA (R01AG056477), and the Academy of Finland (350426); H-SJ by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (1R01DA0663; 1R01DA026863); and YBA and the Stockholm Birth Cohort Multigenerational Study by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte, 2016-07148, 2019-00058). AS and ETM were supported by the Nuffield Foundation (JUS/43052) and the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/R008930/1).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All individual studies featured in this meta-analysis have their own local ethical approval.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.