PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Pearson, S.
AU  - Petsas, A.
AU  - Balabanovic, J.
AU  - Juj, M.
AU  - Harris, W.
AU  - Bonnici, T.
TI  - Person-Centred Critical Care: Lessons from a Service Evaluation
AID  - 10.1101/2024.01.26.24301616
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.01.26.24301616
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/26/2024.01.26.24301616.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/26/2024.01.26.24301616.full
AB  - Context ‘Critical care’ encompasses ‘intensive care’, ‘intensive therapy’ and ‘high dependency’ care and is operationalised when patients require specialised monitoring and intervention following complex surgery, or a life-threatening illness or injury.Background During the pandemic, the Critical Care Department at UCLH formed a family liaison team to bridge the connection gap between patients, families, and clinical teams. This evolved into the Patient & Family Team (PFT), which organised several engagement events to understand patient and family experiences in critical care.Methods Focus group discussions were conducted online and in-person with patients and bereaved families exploring their experience of the service. Discussions revolved around pivotal moments in the critical care journey. Feedback was analysed thematically and validated with the participants.Findings Patients described their journey through four stages: Admission, Period of Disorientation, Re-Awakening, and Recovery. Bereaved families categorised their experiences into seven stages from ‘The Phone Call’ to ‘Bereavement.’ The need for effective and compassionate communication and support was evident for both groups.Discussion Feedback revealed the emotional journeys of patients and families in critical care. While many experiences align with the existing literature, they also highlight areas for improvement, emphasising the value of human connection in healthcare. This study also demonstrated the need for continuous service evaluation and strategies for understanding underserved populations.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThese events were funded by the UCL Hospitals Charitable Foundation via the UCLH Family Communication Transformation Project.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:In conducting our study, we recognised the importance of ethical oversight. The ethical review for our project was undertaken by the University College London Hospitals NHS Trust (UCLH) Critical Care Multidisciplinary Integrated Governance (MIG) committee. This committee has governance and operational oversight for the Critical Care Department at UCLH, located in England, UK. The UCLH Critical Care MIG reviewed our study and concluded that formal ethical approval was not necessary. This decision was based on the classification of our project as service evaluation, aligning with the 2023 guidelines provided by the Health Research Authority (HRA) in England. According to these guidelines, our project did not fall under the category of 'research', thereby not requiring HRA approval. Despite this waiver, we adhered rigorously to the United Kingdom Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research, as outlined by the HRA in 2023. This adherence underscores our commitment to maintaining ethical standards in conducting evaluations, ensuring the safeguarding of staff and participants involved in our study. Additionally, it is important to note the process of participant engagement in our project. We provided clear information regarding the purpose of the engagement events. Participation in these events was based on implicit consent, with the understanding that attendees were fully informed and their engagement constituted consent to participate.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors