RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Automation risk and subjective wellbeing in the UK
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.18.24301484
DO 10.1101/2024.01.18.24301484
A1 Zheng, Jiyuan
A1 Rohenkohl, Bertha
A1 Barahona, Mauricio
A1 Clarke, Jonathan M
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/18/2024.01.18.24301484.abstract
AB The personal well-being of workers may be influenced by the risk of job automation brought about by technological innovation. Here we use data from the Understanding Society survey in the UK and a fixed-effects model to examine associations between working in a highly automatable job and life and job satisfaction. We find that employees in highly automatable jobs report significantly lower job satisfaction, a result that holds across demographic groups categorised by gender, age and education, with higher negative association among men, higher degree holders and younger workers. On the other hand, life satisfaction of workers is not generally associated with the risk of job automation, a result that persists among groups disaggregated by gender and education, but with age differences, since the life satisfaction of workers aged 30 to 49 is negatively associated with job automation risk. Our analysis also reveals differences in these associations across UK industries and regions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis paper is part of the Pissarides Review of the Future of Work and Wellbeing, based at the Institute for the Future of Work and funded by the Nuffield Foundation. Bertha Rohenkohl, Jiyuan Zheng and Mauricio Barahona acknowledge support from the Nuffield Foundation. Mauricio Barahona also acknowledges support by the EPSRC under grant EP/N014529/1 funding the EPSRC Centre for Mathematics of Precision Healthcare at Imperial. Jonathan Clarke acknowledges support from the Wellcome Trust (215938/Z/19/Z). We would like to thank Professor Christopher Pissarides for his helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at the UK Data Service (https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000053) and the Office for National Statistics (https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/datasets/probabilityofautomationinengland)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes