RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Reducing Inequalities Using an Unbiased Machine Learning Approach to Identify Births with the Highest Risk of Preventable Neonatal Deaths
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.12.24301163
DO 10.1101/2024.01.12.24301163
A1 Ramos, Antonio P.
A1 Caldieraro, Fabio
A1 Nascimento, Marcus L.
A1 Saldanha, Rafael
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/13/2024.01.12.24301163.abstract
AB Background Despite contemporaneous declines in neonatal mortality, recent studies show the existence of left-behind populations that continue to have higher mortality rates than the national averages. Additionally, many of these deaths are from preventable causes. This reality creates the need for more precise methods to identify high-risk births so that policymakers can more precisely target them. This study fills this gap by developing unbiased machine-learning approaches to more accurately identify births with a high risk of neonatal deaths from preventable causes.Methods We link administrative databases from the Brazilian health ministry to obtain birth and death records in the country from 2015 to 2017. The final dataset comprises 8,797,968 births, of which 59,615 newborns died before reaching 28 days alive (neonatal deaths). These neonatal deaths are categorized into preventable deaths (42,290) and non-preventable deaths (17,325). Our analysis identifies the death risk of the former group, as they are amenable to policy interventions. We train six machine-learning algorithms, test their performance on unseen data, and evaluate them using a new policy-oriented metric. To avoid biased policy recommendations, we also investigate how our approach impacts disadvantaged populations.Results XGBoost was the best performance algorithm for our task: the 5% births of the highest predicted risk from this model capture more than 85% of the actual deaths. Furthermore, the risk predictions exhibit no statistical differences in the proportion of actual preventable deaths from disadvantaged populations, defined by race, education, marital status, and maternal age. These results are similar for other thresh-old levels.Conclusions We show that, by using publicly available administrative data sets and ML methods, it is possible to identify the births with the highest risk of preventable deaths with a high degree of accuracy. This is useful for policymakers as they can target health interventions to those who need them the most and where they can be effective without producing bias against disadvantaged populations. Overall, our approach can guide policymakers in reducing neonatal mortality rates and their health inequalities. Finally, it can be adapted to be used in other developing countries.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe Getu ́lio Vargas Foundation partially supported this work, award number PAR-004.037.019.00009.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data is publicly available. The code used in this analysis will be posted in a public repository.