PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jeong, Jiwoong AU - Chao, Chieh-Ju AU - Arsanjani, Reza AU - Ayoub, Chadi AU - Lester, Steven J. AU - Pereyra, Milagros AU - Said, Ebram F AU - Roarke, Michael AU - Tagle-Cornell, Cecilia AU - Koepke, Laura M. AU - Tsai, Yi-Lin AU - Jung-Hsuan, Chen AU - Chang, Chun-Chin AU - Farina, Juan M. AU - Trivedi, Hari AU - Patel, Bhavik N. AU - Banerjee, Imon TI - Opportunistic screening for coronary artery calcium deposition using chest radiographs – a multi-objective models with multi-modal data fusion AID - 10.1101/2024.01.10.23299699 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.01.10.23299699 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/11/2024.01.10.23299699.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/11/2024.01.10.23299699.full AB - Background To create an opportunistic screening strategy by multitask deep learning methods to stratify prediction for coronary artery calcium (CAC) and associated cardiovascular risk with frontal chest x-rays (CXR) and minimal data from electronic health records (EHR).Methods In this retrospective study, 2,121 patients with available computed tomography (CT) scans and corresponding CXR images were collected internally (Mayo Enterprise) with calculated CAC scores binned into 3 categories (0, 1-99, and 100+) as ground truths for model training. Results from the internal training were tested on multiple external datasets (domestic (EUH) and foreign (VGHTPE)) with significant racial and ethnic differences and classification performance was compared.Findings Classification performance between 0, 1-99, and 100+ CAC scores performed moderately on both the internal test and external datasets, reaching average f1-score of 0.66 for Mayo, 0.62 for EUH and 0.61 for VGHTPE. For the clinically relevant binary task of 0 vs 400+ CAC classification, the performance of our model on the internal test and external datasets reached an average AUCROC of 0.84.Interpretation The fusion model trained on CXR performed better (0.84 average AUROC on internal and external dataset) than existing state-of-the-art models on predicting CAC scores only on internal (0.73 AUROC), with robust performance on external datasets. Thus, our proposed model may be used as a robust, first-pass opportunistic screening method for cardiovascular risk from regular chest radiographs. For community use, trained model and the inference code can be downloaded with an academic open-source license from https://github.com/jeong-jasonji/MTL_CAC_classification.Funding The study was partially supported by National Institute of Health 1R01HL155410-01A1 award.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was partially supported by National Institute of Health 1R01HL155410-01A1 award.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Mayo Clinic gave ethical approval for this work IRB of Emory University gave ethical approval for this work IRB of VGHTPE gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data is internal and is not available for access at the moment.