RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Understanding Individualized Risk of Respiratory Morbidity to Guide Shared Decision-Making Around Late Preterm Steroids
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.04.23299873
DO 10.1101/2024.01.04.23299873
A1 Clapp, Mark A.
A1 Li, Siguo
A1 Cohen, Jessica L.
A1 Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia
A1 Kaimal, Anjali J.
A1 Knudsen, Amy B.
A1 Lorch, Scott A
A1 Thaweethai, Tanayott
A1 Wright, Jason D.
A1 Melamed, Alexander
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/08/2024.01.04.23299873.abstract
AB Objective To estimate the effect of antenatal steroids on the absolute risk of respiratory morbidity among subgroups of patients based on two clinical factors with known varying baseline risks of morbidity: planned mode of delivery and gestational age at presentation.Methods This is a secondary analysis of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid (ALPS) Trial, a study that randomized individuals at high risk for late preterm delivery (34-36 weeks of gestation) to antenatal steroids or placebo. We fit logistic regression models to estimate the absolute risk of respiratory morbidity, with and without steroid administration, by gestational age and planned mode of delivery at the time of presentation. We assumed a homogenous effect of steroids on the log-odds scale, as was reported in the ALPS trial. To aid in shared decision-making, we report absolute risks of neonatal respiratory complications with and without steroid administration graphically, in tabular form, and via an online tool available at XXX.Results The analysis included 2,825 patients at risk for late preterm birth. The risk of respiratory morbidity varied significantly by planned mode of delivery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.19 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68, 2.85) for cesarean compared to vaginal delivery) and day of gestation at presentation (aOR 0.91 (95% CI 0.89, 0.93)). For those planning a cesarean delivery and presenting in the 34th week of gestation, the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 36.7% (95% CI 29.8, 43.7%) without steroids and 31.4% (95% CI 24.5, 37.9%) with steroids. In contrast, for patients presenting in the 36th week and planning a vaginal delivery, the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity was 6.8% (95% CI 5.1, 8.5%) without steroids and 5.4% (95% 4.0, 6.9%) with steroids.Conclusion The absolute risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity among patients at risk for late preterm delivery varies considerably by gestational age at presentation and planned mode of delivery. As communicating only the relative risk reduction of antenatal steroids for respiratory morbidity may exaggerate the perception of benefit, especially for those with a small absolute risk, individualized estimates of absolute risk expected with and without treatment may inform shared decision-making.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Mass General Brigham IRB waived ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data used in this study are publicly available via the NICHD's Data and Specimen Hub (https://dash.nichd.nih.gov/).https://dash.nichd.nih.gov/