RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Bridging the gap: improving correspondence between low-field and high-field magnetic resonance images in young people
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.05.24300892
DO 10.1101/2024.01.05.24300892
A1 Cooper, Rebecca
A1 Hayes, Rebecca
A1 Corcoran, Mary
A1 Sheth, Kevin N
A1 Arnold, Thomas Campbell
A1 Stein, Joel
A1 Glahn, David C.
A1 Jalbrzikowski, Maria
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/07/2024.01.05.24300892.abstract
AB Background Portable low-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems represent a promising alternative to traditional high-field-strength systems with the potential to make MR technology available at scale in low-resource settings. However, lower image quality and resolution may limit the research and clinical potential of these devices. We tested two super-resolution methods to enhance image quality in a low-field MR system and compared their correspondence with images acquired from a high-field system in a sample of young people.Methods T1- and T2-weighted structural MR images were obtained from a low-field (64mT) Hyperfine and high-field (3T) Siemens system in N = 70 individuals (mean age=20.39 years, range 9-26 years). We tested two super-resolution approaches to improve image correspondence between images acquired at high- and low-field: 1) processing via a convolutional neural network (‘SynthSR’), and 2) multi-orientation image averaging. We extracted brain region volumes, cortical thickness, and cortical surface area estimates. We used Pearson correlations to test the correspondence between these measures, and Steiger Z tests to compare the difference in correspondence between standard imaging and super-resolution approaches.Results Single pairs of T1- and T2-weighted images acquired at low field showed high correspondence to high-field-strength images for estimates of total intracranial volume, surface area cortical volume, subcortical volume, and total brain volume (r range=0.60-0.88). Correspondence was lower for cerebral white matter volume (r=0.32, p=.007, q=.009) and non-significant for mean cortical thickness (r=-0.05, p=.664, q =.664). Processing images with SynthSR yielded significant improvements in correspondence for total brain volume, white matter volume, total surface area, subcortical volume, cortical volume, and total intracranial volume (r range=0.85-0.97), with the exception of global mean cortical thickness (r=0.14). An alternative multi-orientation image averaging approach improved correspondence for cerebral white matter and total brain volume.Processing with SynthSR also significantly improved correspondence across widespread regions for estimates of cortical volume, surface area and subcortical volume, as well as within isolated prefrontal and temporal regions for estimates of cortical thickness.Conclusions Applying super-resolution approaches to low-field imaging improves regional brain volume and surface area accuracy in young people. Finer-scale brain measurements, such as cortical thickness, remain challenging with the limited resolution of low-field systems.Competing Interest StatementT. Campbell Arnold is an employee of Subtle Medical. Joel Stein has received support through sponsored-research agreements with Hyperfine Research, Inc.Funding StatementMaria Jalbrzikowski was supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (grant R01MH129636) and the Tommy Fuss Center for Neuropsychiatric Research Next Generation Award. Rebecca Hayes was supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (grant R01MH129636). Rebecca Cooper was supported by the Tommy Fuss Center for Neuropsychiatric Research Fellowship Award. Joel Stein was supported in part by the National Institutes of Mental Health (grant R01MH129636). T. Campbell Arnold was funded in part by the HHMI-NIBIB Interfaces Initiative (5T32EB009384-10) and National Institutes of Mental Health (DP1NS122038). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of Boston Children's Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.