RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Perspectives of young people, family carers and voluntary sector staff on help-seeking for mental health difficulties in a rural region of the United Kingdom - a qualitative study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.04.24300825
DO 10.1101/2024.01.04.24300825
A1 Oduola, Sheri
A1 Coombes, Emma
A1 Hodgekins, Jo
A1 Jones, Andy
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/05/2024.01.04.24300825.abstract
AB Purpose To explore key stakeholders from rural communities’ perspectives of help-seeking for mental health difficulties.Methods/design Semi-structured interviews and a focus group were conducted with participants living in the East of England, UK. Thematic analysis was used to organise and analyse the data.Results Nine participants were recruited. Participants described barriers and facilitators of help-seeking. Barriers included: lengthy waiting times, socioeconomic means, poor therapeutic relationships, insufficient treatment duration, poor transition between services, high staff turnover, and limited investment. Facilitators included: family involvement/support, school nurses, shorter delays in accessing specialist services such as eating disorder services, and the offer of family therapy. Suggestions for improving future help-seeking and pathways to care, included: peer-support for young people, enhanced support for carers, early intervention and raising awareness of mental health.Originality Our qualitative approach meant we were able to explore in detail the existence and mechanisms underlying varied barriers and facilitators of care pathways amongst our sample. This allowed us to report rich findings and recommendations for clinical practice and future research work.Practical implications Training young people to support other young people, and identifying mental health champions in rural communities could reduce distress and ameliorate pressures on the health service.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by Research Capability Funding from the Norfolk and Waveney CCG, administered by the Norfolk and Suffolk Primary and Community Care Research office. Reference NWCCG RCF2021/22 _ R210651. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Norfolk and Suffolk Primary and Community Care Research Office or of Norfolk and Waveney CCG.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from the University of East Anglia, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 2021/22-018).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript