RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Barriers to healthcare access: findings from a co-produced Long Covid case-finding study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.01.03.24300767
DO 10.1101/2024.01.03.24300767
A1 Clutterbuck, Donna
A1 Ramasawmy, Mel
A1 Pantelic, Marija
A1 Hayer, Jasmine
A1 Begum, Fauzia
A1 Faghy, Mark
A1 Nasir, Nayab
A1 Causer, Barry
A1 Heightman, Melissa
A1 Allsopp, Gail
A1 Wootton, Dan
A1 Khan, M Asad
A1 Hastie, Claire
A1 Jackson, Monique
A1 Rayner, Clare
A1 Brown, Darren
A1 Parrett, Emily
A1 Jones, Geraint
A1 Clarke, Rowan
A1 Mcfarland, Sammie
A1 Gabbay, Mark
A1 Banerjee, Amitava
A1 Alwan, Nisreen A
A1 ,
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/04/2024.01.03.24300767.abstract
AB Background and aim Long Covid can be a stigmatising condition, particularly in people who are disadvantaged within society. This may prevent them seeking help and could lead to widening health inequalities. This co-produced study with a Community Advisory Board of people with Long Covid aimed to understand healthcare and wider barriers and stigma experienced by people with probable Long Covid.Methods An active case finding approach was employed to find adults with probable, but not yet clinically diagnosed, Long Covid in two localities in London (Camden and Merton) and Derbyshire, England. Interviews explored the barriers to care, and the stigma faced by participants and analysed thematically. This study forms part of the STIMULATE-ICP Collaboration.Findings Twenty-three interviews were completed. Participants reported limited awareness of what Long Covid is and the available pathways to management. There was considerable self-doubt among participants, sometimes reinforced by interactions with healthcare professionals. Participants questioned their deservedness of seeking healthcare support for their symptoms. Hesitancy to engage with healthcare services was motivated by fear of needing more investigation and concerns regarding judgement about ability to carry out caregiving responsibilities. It was also motivated by the complexity of the clinical presentation and fear of all symptoms being attributed to poor mental health. Participants also reported trying to avoid overburdening the health system. These difficulties were compounded by experiences of stigma and discrimination. The emerging themes reaffirmed a framework of epistemic injustice in relation to Long Covid, where creating, interpreting, and conveying knowledge has varied credibility based on the teller’s identity characteristics and/or the level of their interpretive resources.Conclusion We have developed recommendations based on the findings. These include early signposting to services, dedicating protected time to listen to people with Long Covid, providing a holistic approach in care pathways, and working to mitigate stigma. Regardless of the diagnosis, people experiencing new symptoms must be encouraged to seek timely medical help. Clear public health messaging is needed among communities already disadvantaged by epistemic injustice to raise awareness of Long Covid, and to share stories that encourage seeking care and to illustrate the adverse effects of stigma.Patient or Public Contribution This study was co-produced with a Community Advisory Board (CAB) made up of twenty-three members including healthcare professionals, people with lived experience of Long Covid and other stakeholders.Competing Interest StatementCR is a member of Society of Occupational medicine Long Covid Taskforce, has received occasional honoraria for talks given on Long Covid, has done occasional paid consultancy work for employers. NAA is a scientific advisor to the Long Covid Support Charity and has contributed in an advisory capacity to WHO and the EU Commission's Expert Panel on effective ways of investing in health meetings in relation to post-COVID-19 condition. CR and NAA are Long Covid Kids Charity Champions.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [STIMULATE-ICP grant number COV-LT2-0043] and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Wessex. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. MG is part funded by National Institute of Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC). DW is supported by an Advanced Fellowship from the NIHR (NIHR300669). The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study received ethical approval from the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee on 27th July 2022 (reference number 72400).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe anonymised data that support the findings of this study can be made available on reasonable request from the corresponding authors.