RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Using Generative Artificial Intelligence to Classify Primary Progressive Aphasia from Connected Speech
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.12.22.23300470
DO 10.1101/2023.12.22.23300470
A1 Rezaii, Neguine
A1 Quimby, Megan
A1 Wong, Bonnie
A1 Hochberg, Daisy
A1 Brickhouse, Michael
A1 Touroutoglou, Alexandra
A1 Dickerson, Bradford C.
A1 Wolff, Phillip
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/26/2023.12.22.23300470.abstract
AB Neurodegenerative dementia syndromes, such as Primary Progressive Aphasias (PPA), have traditionally been diagnosed based in part on verbal and nonverbal cognitive profiles. Debate continues about whether PPA is best subdivided into three variants and also regarding the most distinctive linguistic features for classifying PPA variants. In this study, we harnessed the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) to first perform unsupervised classification of concise, connected speech samples from 78 PPA patients. Large Language Models discerned three distinct PPA clusters, with 88.5% agreement with independent clinical diagnoses. Patterns of cortical atrophy of three data-driven clusters corresponded to the localization in the clinical diagnostic criteria. We then used NLP to identify linguistic features that best dissociate the three PPA variants. Seventeen features emerged as most valuable for this purpose, including the observation that separating verbs into high and low-frequency types significantly improves classification accuracy. Using these linguistic features derived from the analysis of brief connected speech samples, we developed a classifier that achieved 97.9% accuracy in predicting PPA subtypes and healthy controls. Our findings provide pivotal insights for refining early-stage dementia diagnosis, deepening our understanding of the characteristics of these neurodegenerative phenotypes and the neurobiology of language processing, and enhancing diagnostic evaluation accuracy.One sentence summary Computational linguistic analyses of naturalistic speech samples can classify the aphasic variant of patients similarly to expert clinicians and identify well-established and novel linguistic features crucial for classification.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the US National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders grants R01 DC014296 to BCD and R21 DC019567 to BCD and PW, National Institute on Aging grants R01 AG081249 to BCD and R21 AG073744 to BCD and PW, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grant RF1 NS131395 to BCD, and Alzheimer's Association grant 23AACSF-1029880 to NR. This research was carried out in part at the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at the MGH, using resources provided by the Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies, P41EB015896, a P41 Biotechnology Resource Grant supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), National Institutes of Health. This work also involved the use of instrumentation supported by the NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant Program and/or High-End Instrumentation Grant Program, specifically, grant number(s) S10RR021110, S10RR023043, S10RR023401.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All study participants provided informed consent in accordance with guidelines established by the Mass General Brigham Healthcare System Institutional Review Boards, which govern human subjects research at MGH and specifically approved this studyI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesCodes and data used in this work can be accessed upon sending a request to Dr. Bradford Dickerson at brad.dcikerson{at}mgh.harvard.edu.