RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Treatment preferences among people at risk of developing tuberculosis: a discrete choice experiment
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.12.20.23300332
DO 10.1101/2023.12.20.23300332
A1 Kamchedzera, Wala
A1 Quaife, Matthew
A1 Msukwa-Panje, Wezi
A1 Burke, Rachael M
A1 Macpherson, Liana
A1 Kumwenda, Moses
A1 Twabi, Hussein H
A1 Quartagno, Matteo
A1 MacPherson, Peter
A1 Esmail, Hanif
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/24/2023.12.20.23300332.abstract
AB Diagnosing and treating tuberculosis (TB) early, prior to bacteriological conformation (e.g. bacteriologically-negative but radiologically-apparent TB) may contribute to more effective TB care and reduce transmission. However, optimal treatment approaches for this group are unknown. It is important to understand peoples’ preferences of treatment options for effective programmatic implementation of people-centred treatment approaches.We designed and implemented a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to solicit treatment preferences among adults (≥18 years) with TB symptoms attending a primary health clinic in Blantyre, Malawi. Quantitative choice modelling with multinomial logit models estimated through frequentist and Bayesian approaches investigated preferences for the management of bacteriologically-negative, but radiographically-apparent TB.128 participants were recruited (57% male, 43.8% HIV-positive, 8.6% previously treated for TB). Participants preferred any treatment option compared to no treatment (odds ratio [OR]: 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07, 0.42). Treatments that reduced the relative risk of developing TB disease by 80% were preferred (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.09, 4.21) compared to treatments that lead to a lower reduction in risk of 50%. However, there was no evidence for treatments that are 95% effective being preferred over those that are 80% effective. Participants strongly favoured the treatments that could completely stop transmission (OR: 7.87, 95% CI: 5.71, 10.84), and prioritised avoiding side effects (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.29). There was no evidence of an interaction between perceived TB disease risk and treatment preferences.In summary, participants were primarily concerned with the effectiveness of TB treatments and strongly preferred treatments that removed the risk of onward transmission. Person-centred approaches of preferences for treatment should be considered when designing new treatment strategies. Understanding treatment preferences will ensure that any recommended treatment for probable early TB disease is well accepted and utilized by the public.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by an MRC award (Grant Ref: MR/V00476X/1) to HE.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was received from the University of Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (P.02/21/3271) and University College London Research Ethics Committee (ID Number: 19219/001).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe data dictionary and full dataset has been uploaded to the UCL research repository (private link https://figshare.com/s/2c63e73d69d6e7f58916). Embargo date 1/3/2024 which will be aligned with publication date