PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hu, Ling AU - Chen, Shaoqiu AU - Fu, Yuanyuan AU - Gao, Zitong AU - Long, Hui AU - Ren, Hong-wei AU - Zuo, Yi AU - Li, Huan AU - Wang, Jie AU - Xu, Qing-bang AU - Yu, Wen-xiong AU - Liu, Jia AU - Shao, Chen AU - Hao, Jun-jie AU - Wang, Chuan-zhen AU - Ma, Yao AU - Wang, Zhanwei AU - Yanagihara, Richard AU - Wang, Jian-ming AU - Deng, Youping TI - Risk Factors Associated with Clinical Outcomes in 323 COVID-19 Patients in Wuhan, China AID - 10.1101/2020.03.25.20037721 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.03.25.20037721 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/26/2020.03.25.20037721.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/26/2020.03.25.20037721.full AB - Background With evidence of sustained transmission in more than 190 countries, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a global pandemic. As such, data are urgently needed about risk factors associated with clinical outcomes.Methods A retrospective chart review of 323 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan was conducted. Patients were classified into three disease severity groups (non-severe, severe, and critical), based on their initial clinical presentation. Clinical outcomes were designated as favorable and unfavorable, based on disease progression and response to treatments. Logistic regression models were performed to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes, and log-rank test was conducted for the association with clinical progression.Results Current standard treatments did not show significant improvement on patient outcomes in the study. By univariate logistic regression model, 27 risk factors were significantly associated with clinical outcomes. Further, multivariate regression indicated that age over 65 years, smoking, critical disease status, diabetes, high hypersensitive troponin I (>0.04 pg/mL), leukocytosis (>10 × 109/L) and neutrophilia (>75 × 109/L) predicted unfavorable clinical outcomes. By contrast, the use of hypnotics was significantly associated with favorable outcomes. Survival analysis also confirmed that patients receiving hypnotics had significantly better survival.Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first indication that hypnotics could be an effective ancillary treatment for COVID-19. We also found that novel risk factors, such as higher hypersensitive troponin I, predicted poor clinical outcomes. Overall, our study provides useful data to guide early clinical decision making to reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes of COVID-19.(Funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province ZRMS2019000029 and the Top Youth Talent Program in Hubei Province.)Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province ZRMS2019000029 and the Top Youth Talent Program in Hubei ProvinceAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData sharing not applicable