PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Vlasschaert, Caitlyn
AU  - Giles, Cameron
AU  - Hiremath, Swapnil
AU  - Lanktree, Matthew B.
TI  - Preprint server use in kidney disease research: a rapid review
AID  - 10.1101/2020.03.16.20036590
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.03.16.20036590
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/23/2020.03.16.20036590.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/23/2020.03.16.20036590.full
AB  - Purpose of review Preprint servers including arXiv and bioRxiv have disrupted the scientific communication landscape by providing rapid access to pre--peer reviewed research. MedRxiv is a recently launched free online repository for preprints in the health sciences. We sought to summarize potential benefits and risks to preprint server use, from both the researcher and end--user perspective, and evaluate the uptake of preprint servers in the nephrology community.Sources of Information We performed a rapid review of articles describing preprint servers and their use. We approached the 20 highest impact nephrology journals regarding their policy towards the use of preprint servers. We evaluated the average time from study completion to publication of impactful articles in nephrology. Finally, we evaluated the number of nephrology articles submitted to preprint servers.Findings To date over 600 kidney--related articles have been uploaded to bioRxiv and medRxiv. The average time from study completion to publication was over 10 months. 16 of the top 20 nephrology journals currently accept research submitted to a preprint server. Transparency and collaboration, visibility and recognition, and rapid dissemination of results were identified as benefits of preprint servers. Concerns exist regarding the potential risk of non--peer reviewed medical research being publicly available.Limitations Preprint servers remain a recent phenomenon in health sciences and their long-- term impact on the medical literature remains to be seen.Implications The quantity of research submitted to preprint servers is likely to continue to grow. The model for dissemination of research results will need to adapt to incorporate preprint servers.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was used to generate this report.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is included as Supplementary Information.