RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Trustworthiness of Systematic Review Automation An interview at Coventry University
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.12.14.23299933
DO 10.1101/2023.12.14.23299933
A1 Jiang, Xiaorui
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299933.abstract
AB To reduce both time and labour for systematic review, much effort has been made on developing automated tools using artificial intelligence and machine learning in nearly two decades. Unfortunately, systematic review automation tools still face a serious problem of social acceptance. Previous studies identified lack of trust as one important adoption barrier for systematic review automation. However, further discussion about building trust was limited to building trusted evidence base by benchmarked large-scale evaluation. This study extended the previous discussions of the trustworthiness of systematic review automation. Through semi-structure interviews with regular systematic reviewers, we tried to not only get answers for to what extent human reviewers trust automated tools and why, but also reveal more measures of building trust from human reviewers’ points of view and the impact of such measures on the trust in and adoption of systematic review automation tools. We believe that the results of this study may also shed light on some new directions of systematic review automation research.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of Coventry University gave ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript