PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Chakrabarti, Shinjon
AU  - Krishnan, Kamini
AU  - Galioto, Rachel
TI  - PVT in patients presenting with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19
AID  - 10.1101/2023.12.14.23299928
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.12.14.23299928
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299928.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299928.full
AB  - We investigated performance validity tests (PVTs) in patients presenting with new onset cognitive complaints associated with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 infection (PASC). Retrospective data were obtained from IRB-approved registries. All patients completed the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT) in conjunction with a neuropsychological evaluation. A sub-analysis included 7 other PVT measures. The PASC sample was compared to an analogous multiple sclerosis (MS) sample with known PVT failure rates. The PASC sample consisted of 177 patients (49.4 ± 11.2 years), educated (14.7 ± 2.3 years), predominantly female (81.4%), and white, non-Hispanic (85.3%) patients. Seven percent of the PASC sample scored below the established VSVT hard item cut-off, and of those with invalid VSVT over 50% failed 3 or more additional PVTs. In comparison to a MS sample, the PASC sample reported comparable psychological symptoms, but were significantly less likely to produce invalid VSVT scores and seek disability benefits. This study provides a profile of PVTs in patients presenting with PASC. The general infrequence of invalid responding in this PASC sample (7%) is noteworthy compared to an MS sample and highlights the role of additional factors in non-credible response such as elevated psychological symptoms or pursuit of disability.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of Cleveland Clinic Center for Brain Health gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes