PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Bright, Joanna K.
AU  - Rayner, Christopher
AU  - Freeman, Ze
AU  - Zavos, Helena M.S.
AU  - Ahmadzadeh, Yasmin I.
AU  - Viding, Essi
AU  - McAdams, Tom A.
TI  - Using twin-pairs to assess potential bias in polygenic prediction of externalising behaviours across development
AID  - 10.1101/2023.12.13.23299910
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.12.13.23299910
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.13.23299910.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.13.23299910.full
AB  - Prediction from polygenic scores may be confounded sources of passive gene-environment correlation (rGE; e.g. population stratification, assortative mating, and environmentally mediated effects of parental genotype on child phenotype). Using genomic data from 10,000 twin pairs, we asked whether polygenic scores from the recent externalising genome-wide association study predicted conduct problems, ADHD symptomology and callous-unemotional traits, and whether these predictions are biased by rGE. We ran regression models including within-family and between-family polygenic scores, to separate the direct genetic influence on a trait from environmental influences that correlate with genes (indirect genetic effects). Findings suggested that this externalising polygenic score is a good index of direct genetic influence on conduct and ADHD-related symptoms across development, with minimal bias from rGE, although the polygenic score predicted less variance in CU traits. Post-hoc analyses showed some indirect genetic effects acting on a common factor indexing stability of conduct problems across time and contexts.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementTEDS is supported by a programme grant (MR/V012878/1) to Professor Thalia Eley from the UK Medical Research Council (previously MR/M021475/1 awarded to Professor Robert Plomin) with additional support from the US National Institutes of Health (AG046938). The authors gratefully acknowledge the ongoing contribution of the TEDS participants and their families.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Kings College London ethics committee of the Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience gave ethical approval for this work. Participant consent was collected at every stage of the TEDS data collection and no participant identifiers can be used to identify individuals.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors with approval from the TEDS team.