RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Exploring the associations between skeletal muscle echogenicity and physical function in aging adults: A systematic review with meta-analyses
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.12.13.23299929
DO 10.1101/2023.12.13.23299929
A1 Oranchuk, Dustin J
A1 Bodkin, Stephan G
A1 Boncella, Katie L
A1 Harris-Love, Michael O
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/14/2023.12.13.23299929.abstract
AB Background Assessment and quantification of skeletal muscle within the aging population is vital for diagnosis, treatment, and injury/disease prevention. The clinical availability of assessing muscle quality through diagnostic ultrasound presents an opportunity to be utilized as a screening tool for function-limiting diseases. However, relationships between muscle echogenicity and clinical functional assessments require authoritative analysis. Thus, we aimed to 1) synthesize the literature to assess the relationships between skeletal muscle echogenicity and physical function in older (≥60 years) adults, 2) perform pooled analyses of relationships between skeletal muscle echogenicity and physical function, and 3) perform sub-analyses to determine between-muscle relationships.Methods CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to identify articles relating skeletal muscle echogenicity to physical function in older adults. Meta-analyses with and without sub-analysis for individual muscles were performed utilizing Fisher’s Z transformation for the most common measures of physical function. Fisher’s Z was back-transformed to Pearson’s r for interpretation.Results Fifty-one articles (N=5095, female=∼2759, male=∼2301, 72.5±5.8 years [one study did not provide sex descriptors]) were extracted for review, with previously unpublished data obtained from the authors of 12 studies. The rectus femoris (n=32) and isometric knee extension strength (n=22) were the most accessed muscle and physical qualities, respectively. The relationship between quadriceps echogenicity and knee extensor strength was moderate (n=2924, r=-0.36 [95%CI: −0.38 to −0.32], p<0.001), with all other meta-analyses (grip strength, walking speed, sit- to-stand, timed up-and-go) resulting in slightly weaker correlations (r=−0.34 to −0.23, all p<0.001). Sub-analyses determined minimal differences in predictive ability between muscle groups, although combining muscles (e.g., rectus femoris+vastus lateralis) often resulted in stronger correlations with maximal strength.Conclusions While correlations were modest, the affordable, portable, and noninvasive ultrasonic assessment of muscle quality was a consistent predictor of physical function in older adults. Minimal between-muscle differences suggest that echogenicity estimates of muscle quality are systemic. Therefore, practitioners may be able to scan a single muscle to assess full-body skeletal muscle quality/composition, while researchers should consider combining multiple muscles to strengthen the model.Registration The original protocol was prospectively registered at the National Institute of Health Research PROSPERO (CRD42020201841).HighlightsRelationships between skeletal muscle echogenicity and physical function were small to moderate, but highly consistent.Sub-analyses determined minimal between-muscle differences in predictive ability.Ultrasonic echogenicity should be considered part of early detection screens for sarcopenia and other diseases.Combining muscles tended to strengthen the model, although muscle quality appears systemic, allowing for a single scan to represent the total body.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received for this project.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThis is a meta-analysis, therefore, all underlying data is already available.