PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Aaron, Shawn D. AU - Huynh, Chau AU - Whitmore, George Alex TI - Use of a Single Case-Finding Questionnaire to Simultaneously Target Multiple Related Diseases Allows Enhanced Disease Detection AID - 10.1101/2023.12.08.23299740 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.12.08.23299740 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/10/2023.12.08.23299740.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/10/2023.12.08.23299740.full AB - Objective To develop a research methodology to apply a single case-finding tool to multiple related diseases and to evaluate the ability of a single tool to detect two or more related chronic diseases.Methods Adults in the community with no prior history of physician-diagnosed lung disease who self-reported respiratory symptoms were contacted via random-digit dialing. Multiple risk scores, one for asthma and one for COPD, were developed using data from a single case-finding questionnaire administered to the study population. Each score was statistically optimized for targeted detection of cases having one disease in the class. External validation of tandem risk scores was prospectively conducted in an independent sample and predictive performance re-evaluated.Results Sensitivity for detection of asthma improved from 87% using single risk scores to 96% using tandem risk scores, and sensitivity for detection of COPD similarly improved from 87% to 99%. In the independent validation cohort, case-finding sensitivities increased from 64% and 59% using single risk scores to 95% and 96% using tandem risk scores for asthma and for COPD, respectively.Conclusions Use of a single questionnaire which incorporates risk scores for multiple diseases considered in tandem, rather than individually, enhances the yield of cases detected when compared with one-at-a-time application of risk scores for case discovery. Benefits include greater efficiency in case-finding and improved sensitivities for detection of each disease.What is New?We describe case finding in a population of undiagnosed, symptomatic subjects who have one disease from a class of related chronic diseases.Multiple risk scores are developed using data from a single case-finding instrument administered to a representative sample from the study population. Each score is statistically optimized for targeted detection of cases having one disease in the class.Use of multiple risk scores, when considered in tandem, enhances the yield of cases detected when compared with one-at-a-time application of risk scores for case discovery.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNAFunding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study obtained approval from the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board and Clinical Trials Ontario (CTO). All participants provided informed, written consent. CTO Project ID: 1357 SHORT TITLE: UNDIAGNOSED COPD AND ASTHMA POPULATION STUDY (UCAP) Short Study Title: UCAP {UNDIAGNOSED COPD AND ASTHMA POPULATION STUDY} Sponsor Study ID (if applicable): REB of Record: OHSN-REB (General Campus Panel)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.