RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Association of Cannabis Legalization with Cannabis Positive Drug Screening in US Veterans
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.12.08.23299731
DO 10.1101/2023.12.08.23299731
A1 Fink, David S.
A1 Samples, Hillary
A1 Malte, Carol A.
A1 Olfson, Mark
A1 Wall, Melanie M.
A1 Alschuler, Daniel M.
A1 Saxon, Andrew J.
A1 Hasin, Deborah S.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/09/2023.12.08.23299731.abstract
AB Background Although cannabis legalization is associated with increases in self-report cannabis use, biological measures of cannabis use are needed to address potential bias introduced by improved self-reporting of cannabis use in states enacting medical cannabis laws (MCL) and recreational cannabis laws (RCL).Objective Quantify the role of MCL and RCL enactment in cannabis positive urine drug screen (UDS) prevalence among Veterans Health Administration (VHA) emergency department (ED) patients from 2008 to 2019.Design Staggered-adoption difference-in-difference analysis were used to estimate the role of MCL and RCL in cannabis positive UDS data, fitting adjusted linear binomial regression models to estimate the association between MCL and RCL enactment and prevalence of cannabis positive UDS.Participants VHA enrolled veterans aged 18-75 years with ≥1 ED visit in a given year from 2008 to 2019.Main Measures Receipt of ≥1 cannabis positive UDS during an ED visit were analyzed.Key Results From 2008 to 2019, adjusted cannabis positive UDS prevalences increased from 16.4% to 25.6% in states with no cannabis law, 16.6% to 27.6% in MCL-only enacting states, and 18.2% to 33.8% in RCL-enacting states. MCL-only and MCL/RCL enactment was associated with a 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4-1.0) and 2.9% (95% CI, 2.5-3.3) absolute increase in cannabis positive UDS, respectively. Significant effect sizes were found for MCL and RCL, such that 7.0% and 18.5% of the total increase in cannabis positive UDS prevalence in MCL-only and RCL states could be attributed to MCLs and RCLs.Conclusions In this study of VHA ED patients, MCL and RCL enactment played a significant role in the overall increases in cannabis positive UDS. The increase in a biological measure of cannabis use reduces concerns that previously documented increases in self-reported cannabis use from surveys are due to changes in patient willingness to report use as it becomes more legal.Competing Interest StatementDr Hasin reported support from Syneos Health for an unrelated project. Dr Wall reported grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse during the conduct of the study and grants from the National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. Dr Saxon reported grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse during the conduct of the study; consulting fees from Indivior, travel support from Alkermes, research support from MedicaSafe, and royalties from UpToDate outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.Funding StatementSupported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grants R01DA048860 and K99DA055724), the New York State Psychiatric Institute, and the VA Centers of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by Institutional Review Boards at New York State Psychiatric Institute, VHA Puget Sound and VHA New York Harbor Healthcare Systems.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data are not available.