PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Wang, Ming-Dong
AU  - Fu, Qian-Hui
AU  - Ni, Andrew
AU  - Yuan, Yun-Peng
AU  - Li, Chun-Hui
AU  - Wang, Zhan-Xiang
AU  - Wang, Hong
TI  - The Role of Early Cerebral Edema and Hematoma assessment in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (a-SAH) in predicting Structural Brain Abnormalities in Cognitive Impairments
AID  - 10.1101/2023.12.05.23299565
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.12.05.23299565
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/07/2023.12.05.23299565.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/07/2023.12.05.23299565.full
AB  - Background Early assessment and management of cerebral edema and hematoma following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (a-SAH) can significantly impact clinical cognitive outcomes. However, current clinical practices lack predictive models to identify early structural brain abnormalities affecting cognition. To address this gap, we propose the development of a predictive model termed the a-SAH Early Brain Edema/Hematoma Compression Neural (Structural Brain) Networks Score System (SEBE-HCNNSS).Methods In this study, 202 consecutive patients with spontaneous a-SAH underwent initial computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans within 24 hours of ictus with follow-up 2 months after discharge. Using logistic regression analysis (univariate and multivariate), we evaluated clinically relevant factors and various traditional scale ratings for cognitive impairment (CI). Risk factors with the highest area under the curve (AUC) values were included in the multivariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis or Cox regression analysis.Results A total of 177 patients were enrolled in the study, and 43 patients were classified with a high SEBE-HCNNSS grade (3 to 5). After a mean follow-up of 2 months, 121 individuals (68.36%) with a-SAH and 3 control subjects developed incident CI. The CT inter-observer reliability of the SEBE-HCNNSS scale was high, with a Kappa value of 1. Furthermore, ROC analysis identified the SEBE-HCNNSS scale (OR 3.322, 95% CI 2.312-7.237, p = 0.00025) as an independent predictor of edema, CI, and unfavorable prognosis. These results were also replicated in a validation cohort.Conclusion Overall, the SEBE-HCNNSS scale represents a simple assessment tool with promising predictive value for CI and clinical outcomes post-a-SAH. Our findings indicate its practical utility as a prognostic instrument for risk evaluation after a-SAH, potentially facilitating early intervention and treatment.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialnoneFunding StatementnoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, ID: 2023-1001), and all participants and their proxies provided written informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yesnone