PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ferreira, David AU - Mikhail, Philopatir AU - Lim, Joyce AU - Ray, Max AU - Dwivedi, Jovita AU - Brienesse, Stephen AU - Butel-Simoes, Lloyd AU - Meere, William AU - Bland, Adam AU - Howden, Niklas AU - Malaty, Michael AU - Kunda, Mercy AU - Kelty, Amy AU - McGee, Michael AU - Boyle, Andrew AU - Sverdlov, Aaron L AU - William, Maged AU - Attia, John AU - Jackson, Nicholas AU - Morris, Gwilym AU - Barlow, Malcolm AU - Leitch, James AU - Collins, Nicholas AU - Ford, Thomas AU - Wilsmore, Bradley TI - Manual Chest PRESSURE during Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomised Control Trial (PRESSURE-AF) AID - 10.1101/2023.12.05.23299530 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.12.05.23299530 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/07/2023.12.05.23299530.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/07/2023.12.05.23299530.full AB - Background Direct current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation with anterior-posterior pad positioning.Design, Setting and Participants This was a multi-center, investigator-initiated, patient and analysis blinded, randomised clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across three centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for three weeks or transoesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia.Intervention and Outcomes The intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion.Results 311 patients were randomised, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm versus intervention arm (356.4 ± 301 vs 413.8 ± 347, P=0.25). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance and cardioversion success.Conclusions and Relevance This study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Reducing the complexity of cardioversion will improve the efficiency of the procedure for patients and healthcare systems.Funding None to discloseTrial Registration ACTRN12620001028998Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001028998Clinical Protocols https://openheart.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001739 Funding StatementNone to disclose.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Hunter Research Ethics CommitteeI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesDe-identified patient level data will be available upon reasonable request after review of analysis plan.