RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Objective and Subjective Assessments of Exercise Burden in Masters Athletes Are Poorly Correlated
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.12.06.23299458
DO 10.1101/2023.12.06.23299458
A1 Lewis, Jennifer
A1 Bentley, Robert F.
A1 Connelly, Kim A.
A1 Dorian, Paul
A1 Goodman, Jack M.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/06/2023.12.06.23299458.abstract
AB Accurate quantification of exercise volume (burden) is crucial for understanding links between exercise and cardiovascular outcomes in older endurance athletes (EA). Exercise burden, an integral of intensity and duration (MET·min), is typically determined from subjective self-reports but has uncertain accuracy. We studied 40 EAs (41 to 69 yrs., 50% female) with >10 yrs. training history, during a typical outdoor cycling training session (42 km). Subjective self-reports were related to cardiac (HR·min) and metabolic (MET·min) components of exercise burden, monitored continuously. Subjective self-reports were highly variable and underestimated objective metrics of exercise intensity. Discordance was observed between metabolic and cardiac burden as less fit individuals accrued greater cardiac (14039±2649 vs. 11784±1132 HR·min, P<0.01) but lower metabolic burden (808±59 vs. 858±61 MET·min, P<0.05) vs. higher fit EA. Caution is advised in interpreting MET·min estimates from self-reports, urging objective measurement of cardiac burden for further insights into the risk-benefit relationship of long-term exercise.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for this study was provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR), Operating Grant 130477 and from the Heart & Stroke/Richard Lewar Centres of Excellence.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approval for this study was provided by the University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (RIS RIS Human Protocol 39300).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.