PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Clements, Nia
AU  - Diel, Diego G.
AU  - Elvinger, François
AU  - Koretzky, Gary
AU  - Siler, Julie
AU  - Warnick, Lorin D.
TI  - The role of veterinary diagnostic laboratories during COVID-19 response in the United States
AID  - 10.1101/2023.12.05.23299493
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.12.05.23299493
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/06/2023.12.05.23299493.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/06/2023.12.05.23299493.full
AB  - Robust testing capacity was necessary for public health agencies to respond to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. As the nation faced the need for robust testing capacity, it became necessary to use all possible resources. In many cases, veterinary diagnostic laboratories rose to meet this demand because these facilities routinely perform high throughput diagnostic testing of large animal populations and are typically familiar with pathogens of high pandemic concern. In this study, we evaluated the impact of veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States on SARS-CoV-2 testing. Results of surveys, semi-structured interviews, and analysis of publicly available information showed that veterinary diagnostic laboratories had a substantial impact on human health through population-level testing in the COVID-19 response, supporting timely and informed public health interventions. This success was not without significant hurdles, as many participating veterinary diagnostic laboratories experienced restriction in their response due to difficulties obtaining the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certification required to conduct human diagnostic testing. Our results point out the importance of reducing hurdles before the next major public health emergency to enhance access to testing resources overall and to ultimately improve population health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was exempt from IRB approval because it is not designated as human research.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableData cannot be shared publicly because data is not anonymous. The data includes sensitive information regarding specific institutions and their experiences during COVID-19. The corresponding author will provide data upon request. https://cornell.box.com/s/bssw7jmadyrckxd4ahj3yy2if3u3e7nk