PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Mbele, Whiteson AU - Dako-Gyeke, Phyllis AU - Frans, Andreas Ndapewa TI - COVID-19 vaccination uptake among healthcare workers in Ghana: A comprehensive analysis of knowledge, attitude, perceived vaccine effectiveness, and health belief model constructs AID - 10.1101/2023.12.05.23299475 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.12.05.23299475 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/05/2023.12.05.23299475.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/05/2023.12.05.23299475.full AB - The novel Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) caused devastating effects globally, and healthcare workers were among the most affected by the pandemic. To mitigate this impact, healthcare workers were prioritized in COVID-19 vaccination globally and in Ghana. However, hesitancy by healthcare workers to receive the vaccination resulted in delayed control of the pandemic. In Ghana, vaccine acceptance rate among healthcare workers was estimated to be 39.3% in the pre-vaccine rollout period. Consequently, this study assessed uptake of COVID-19 vaccination and associated factors among healthcare workers in Ghana in the post-vaccine roll-out period.This was an analytical cross-sectional study that used a semi-structured questionnaire to collect data on COVID-19 vaccination uptake and influencing factors from randomly selected 256 healthcare workers in Ayawaso West Municipality, Ghana. Bivariable and Multivariable logistic regression was performed using IBM SPSS version 22 to identify predictors of vaccine uptake and a statistical significance was declared at p<0.05.More than three-fourths of participants 220 (85.9%) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccination, while 36 (14.9%) were hesitant. More than half 139 (54.3%) had adequate knowledge about COVID-19 vaccination and the majority 188 (73.4%) had positive perceptions about its effectiveness. Moreover, 218 (85.2%) of HCWs had a positive attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination. Positive attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination (AOR = 4.3; 95% CI: 1.4, 13.0) and high cues to action (AOR = 5.7; 95% CI: 2.2, 14.8) were the factors that significantly predicted uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers.COVID-19 vaccination among HCWs in Ghana is promising. However, hesitancy to receive the vaccination among a significant proportion of HCWs raises concerns. To ensure vaccination of all healthcare workers, interventions to promote vaccination should target key determinants of vaccination uptake, such as attitude towards the vaccination and cues to action.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by WHO/TDR as part of the Postgraduate Training Programme 2022/2023. The funders played a role in determining the study topic and design. However, the funders had no role in data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approvals to conduct the study were obtained from the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC) with protocol ID: GHS-ERC 052/05/23 and from THE University of Ghana Medical Center Institutional Review Board (UGMC-IRB) with protocol ID: UGMC-IRB/MSRC/050/2023I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within this paper and publicly available at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LICEE8pwyyWdqOnSed9P0JsMsK26QDES/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=118050819842982072749&rtpof=true&sd=true