PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Balasubramanian, Sivakumar
TI  - GMAC: A simple measure to quantify upper limb use from wrist-worn accelerometers
AID  - 10.1101/2023.11.26.23299036
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.11.26.23299036
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/27/2023.11.26.23299036.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/27/2023.11.26.23299036.full
AB  - Various measures have been proposed to quantify upper-limb use through wrist-worn inertial measurement units. The two most popular traditional measures of upper-limb use – thresholded activity counts (TAC) and the gross movement (GM) score suffer from high sensitivity and specificity, respectively. We had previously proposed a hybrid version of these two measures – the GMAC – that showed better overall detection performance. However, the previously proposed GMAC used both accelerometer and gyroscope data and used the same parameter values from the TAC and GM measures. In this paper, we aim to answer two important questions to improve the usefulness of the GMAC measure: (a) can the GMAC measure be implemented using only the accelerometer data? (b) what are the optimal parameter values for the GMAC measure? We propose a modified version of the GMAC that works with only accelerometer data, and optimize this measure’s parameters. This optimized GMAC showed better detection performance than the previously proposed GMAC and surprisingly had comparable performance to that of the best-performing machine learning-based measure (random forest inter-subject model). Although intra-subject machine learning-based measures perform better than the optimized GMAC, the latter is simpler, well suited for real-time upper-limb use detection, and is the best option when a trained machine learning-based intra-subject model or labeled data is unavailable. The optimized GMAC measure can be a useful measure for either offline detection or for real-time detection and feedback of upper limb use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: https://github.com/biorehab/upper-limb-use-assessmentI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at https://github.com/biorehab/upper-limb-use-assessment and https://github.com/siva82kb/gmac https://github.com/biorehab/upper-limb-use-assessment https://github.com/siva82kb/gmac