PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Moreno-Agostino, Darío
AU  - Chanfreau, Jenny
AU  - Knowles, Gemma
AU  - Pelikh, Alina
AU  - Das-Munshi, Jayati
AU  - Ploubidis, George B.
TI  - Gender inequalities in the disruption of long-term life satisfaction trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of time use: evidence from the 1970 British birth cohort
AID  - 10.1101/2023.11.15.23298585
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.11.15.23298585
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/16/2023.11.15.23298585.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/16/2023.11.15.23298585.full
AB  - Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted women’s mental health, although most evidence has focused on mental illbeing outcomes. Previous research suggests that gendered differences in time-use may explain this disparity, as women generally spend more time doing psychologically taxing activities than men. We investigated gender differences in the long-term trajectories of life satisfaction, how these were impacted during the pandemic, and the role of time-use differences in explaining gender inequalities.Methods We used data from 6766 (56.2% women) members of the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70), a nationally representative birth cohort of people born in Great Britain in 1970, who were alive and residing in the UK between May 2020 and March 2021. Life satisfaction was prospectively assessed between the ages of 26 (1996) and 51 (2021) using a single question with responses ranging from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). We analysed life satisfaction trajectories using piecewise latent growth curve models and investigated whether gender differences in the change in the life satisfaction trajectories with the pandemic were explained by self-reported time spent doing different paid and unpaid activities.Findings Women had consistently higher life satisfaction than men prior to the pandemic (Δintercept,unadjusted=0.213 [95% CI: 0.087, 0.340], p=.001) and experienced a more accelerated decline with the pandemic onset (Δquad2,unadjusted=−0.018 [−0.026, −0.011], p<.001). Time-use differences did not account for the more accelerated decrease in women’s life satisfaction levels with the pandemic (Δquad2,adjusted=−0.016 [−0.031, −0.001], p=.035).Interpretation Our study shows pronounced gender inequalities in the impact of the pandemic on the long-term life satisfaction trajectories of adults in their 50s, with women losing their historical advantage over men. Self-reported time-use differences did not account for these inequalities, suggesting that they could be linked to other factors including the ‘mental load’ (invisible, unrecognised labour disproportionately undertook by women) or the menopausal transition.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study represents independent research part supported by the ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health at King's College London [ES/S012567/1]. DM-A, GK, JD-M, and GBP are part supported by the ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health at King's College London [ES/S012567/1]. JD-M is also supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70) is supported by the UKRI Centre for Longitudinal Studies resource centre [ES/M001660/1], and the COVID-19 Survey data collections were funded by the UKRI [ES/V012789/1]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the ESRC, NIHR, or King's College London.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The most recent sweeps of the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70) have all been granted ethical approval by the National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee and all participants have given informed consent. No additional ethical approval was necessary for this secondary data analysis. All data used in this study is available in the UK Data Service upon acceptance of the corresponding end-user license agreements.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70) deidentified data used for this study is available at the UK Data Service.https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=200001