PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Brin, Dana
AU  - Sorin, Vera
AU  - Barash, Yiftach
AU  - Konen, Eli
AU  - Nadkarni, Girish
AU  - Glicksberg, Benjamin S
AU  - Klang, Eyal
TI  - Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2023.11.15.23298583
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.11.15.23298583
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/16/2023.11.15.23298583.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/16/2023.11.15.23298583.full
AB  - The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in radiology presents opportunities to enhance diagnostic processes. As of recently, OpenAI’s multimodal GPT-4 can analyze both images and textual data (GPT-4V). This study evaluates GPT-4V’s performance in interpreting radiological images across a variety of modalities, anatomical regions, and pathologies. Fifty-two anonymized diagnostic images were analyzed using GPT-4V, and the results were compared with board-certified radiologists interpretations. GPT-4V correctly recognized the imaging modality in all cases. The model’s performance in identifying pathologies and anatomical regions was inconsistent and varied between modalities and anatomical regions. Overall accuracy for anatomical region identification was 69.2% (36/52), ranging from 0% (0/16) in US images to 100% (15/15, 21/21) in X-ray and CT images. The model correctly identified pathologies in 30.5% of cases (11/36), ranging from 0% (0/9) in US images to 66.7% (8/12) for X-rays. The findings of this study indicate that despite its potential, multimodal GPT-4 is not yet a reliable tool for radiological images interpretation. Our study provides a baseline for future improvements in multimodal LLMs and highlights the importance of continued development to achieve reliability in radiology.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The IRB of Sheba Medical Center gave ethical approval for this work I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors