RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Empowering Healthcare Professionals in West Africa □ A Feasibility Study and Qualitative Assessment of a Dietary Screening Tool to Identify Adults at High Risk of Hypertension
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.11.09.23297914
DO 10.1101/2023.11.09.23297914
A1 Batubo, Nimisoere P.
A1 Nwanze, Nnenna M.
A1 Alikor, Chizindu A.
A1 Auma, Carolyn I.
A1 Moore, J. Bernadette
A1 Zulyniak, Michael A.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/10/2023.11.09.23297914.abstract
AB Background Dietary risks significantly contribute to hypertension in Nigeria. Food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) can provide valuable dietary assessment but require rigorous validation and careful design to facilitate usability. This study assessed the feasibility and potential effectiveness of implementing a clinical screening tool for identifying adults at high risk of hypertension in West Africa.Materials and methods 58 consenting adult patients with hypertension and their caregivers and 35 healthcare professionals from a single-centre Nigerian hospital were recruited to complete a 27-item FFQ at two-time points and three 24-hour recalls for comparison in a mixed method study employing both quantitative questionnaires and qualitative techniques to elicit free form text. Data analyses were conducted using R software version 4.3.1 and NVivo version 14. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05973760.Results The mean age of patients was 42.6 ± 11.9 years, with an average SBP of 140.3 ± 29.8 mmHg and a BMI of 29.5 ± 7.1 Kg/m2. The adherence rate was 87.9%, and the mean completion time was 7:37 minutes. 96.6% of patients found the FFQ easy to complete, comprehensive, and valuable. A minority reported difficulty (3.4%), discomfort (10.3%), and proposed additional foods (6.9%). Healthcare professionals considered the screening tool very important (82.9%) and expressed a willingness to adopt the tool, with some suggestions for clarification. Patients and healthcare professionals found the screening tool favourable for nutritional counselling in hypertension care.Conclusion The tailored screening tool (FFQ) demonstrated promising feasibility for integration into clinical care as assessed by patients and healthcare professionals. Successful implementation may benefit from proactive time management and addressing training needs. This user-centred approach provided key insights to refine FFQ and set the foundation for ongoing validity testing and evaluation in clinical practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.25.23296109 Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) of Nigeria. MAZ is currently funded by Wellcome Trust (217446/Z/19/Z). The funders do not have any role in any aspect of this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of Business, Earth & Environment, Social Sciences (AREA FREC) Committee, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom gave ethical approval for this work (0484). AND Ethics committee/IRB of Rivers State University Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee in Port Harcourt, Nigeria gave ethical approval for this work (RSUTH/REC/2023316).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. others shall be made available on request.