PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Beleigoli, Alline
AU  - Dafny, Hila Ariela
AU  - de Plaza, Maria Alejandra Pinero
AU  - Hutchinson, Claire
AU  - Marin, Tania
AU  - Ramos, Joyce S
AU  - Suebkinorn, Orathai
AU  - Gebremichael, Lemlem G.
AU  - Bulamu, Norma B.
AU  - Keech, Wendy
AU  - Ludlow, Marie
AU  - Hendriks, Jeroen
AU  - Versace, Vincent
AU  - Clark, Robyn A.
ED - 
TI  - Clinical Effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation utilisation and the barriers to its completion among patients of low socioeconomic status living in rural areas: a mixed methods study
AID  - 10.1101/2023.11.09.23298047
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.11.09.23298047
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/10/2023.11.09.23298047.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/10/2023.11.09.23298047.full
AB  - Background Low socioeconomic status (LSES) and rurality are associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes and reduced cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation.Aim To investigate CR utilization and effectiveness, factors, needs and barriers associated with non-completion among patients of LSES in rural Australia.Methods Through a concurrent triangulation mixed methods design we converged the results of a retrospective cohort and a qualitative study. A Cox survival model applied to a population balanced by inverse probability weighting assessed the association between CR utilization and 12-month mortality/cardiovascular readmissions. Associations with non-completion were tested by logistic regression. Barriers and needs to CR completion were evaluated by thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 28 participants.Results Among 16,159 eligible separations, 44.3% were referred and 11.2% completed CR. Completing CR (HR 0.65; 95%CI 0.57-0.74; p<0.001) led to a lower risk of cardiovascular readmission/death. Living alone (OR 1.38; 95%CI 1.00-1.89; p=0.048), having diabetes (OR 1.48; 95%CI 1.02-2.13; p=0.037), or having depression (OR 1.54; 95%CI 1.14-2.08; p=0.005), were associated with a higher risk of non-completion whereas enrolment in a telehealth program was associated with a lower risk of non-completion (OR 0.26; 95%CI 0.18-0.38; p<0.001). Themes related to logistic issues, social support, transition of care challenges, lack of care integration, and of person-centeredness emerged as barriers to CR completion.Conclusions CR completion was low but effective in reducing mortality/cardiovascular readmissions. Understanding and addressing barriers and needs through mixed methods can help tailor CR programs to vulnerable populations and improve completion and outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Flinders Foundation Health Seeding Grant and by the Country Heart Attack Prevention (CHAP) project, a peer-reviewed National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Partnership Grant GNT1169893). VV is funded by the Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training (RHMT) program (Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study received approval from the South Australian Department for Health and Wellbeing Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/HRE00270) and the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (LNR/22/SAC/71). A waiver of consent was granted to the project by the Department for Health and Wellbeing Ethics Committee.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors