PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Bick, Sarah
AU  - White, Sian
AU  - Thorseth, Astrid Hasund
AU  - Friedrich, Max N D
AU  - Gavin, Ian
AU  - Gautam, Om Prasad
AU  - Dreibelbis, Robert
TI  - Frequency and determinants of COVID-19 prevention behaviours: assessment of large-scale programmes in seven countries
AID  - 10.1101/2023.11.03.23298032
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.11.03.23298032
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/04/2023.11.03.23298032.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/04/2023.11.03.23298032.full
AB  - Pre-existing health and economic challenges mean residents of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are likely to be particularly vulnerable to infectious disease pandemics. Limited access to hygiene facilities, water, soap and masks, and dense living environments impeded effective practice of preventive behaviours – handwashing with soap (HWWS), mask wearing and physical distancing – a key line of primary defence against COVID-19. Here we describe a multi-country analysis of prevalence of key hygiene prevention behaviours and their determinants associated with an international non-governmental organisation (WaterAid) hygiene behaviour change programmes for COVID-19 prevention. The goal of this analysis is to inform future outbreak preparedness and pandemic response in LMICs. Cross-sectional household surveys were conducted in October-November 2020 in seven countries where WaterAid worked (Ethiopia, Ghana, Nepal, Nigeria, Rwanda, Tanzania and Zambia). Multivariable mixed-effects regression analyses were used to explore relationships between self-reported behavioural outcomes of interest (handwashing with soap, physical distancing, and mask use) and demographic characteristics, behavioural factors (knowledge, norms, barriers, motives), and exposure to COVID-19 communications. Most respondents (80%) reported increasing their handwashing behaviour after the pandemic, but practice of HWWS at COVID-19-specific prevention moments was low. Mask wearing (58%) and physical distancing (29%) varied substantially between countries. Determinants of key behaviours were identified, including age and socioeconomic status, perceived norms, self-regulation, and the motive of protecting others. These findings highlight that leveraging behaviour-specific emotional drivers and norms, reducing common barriers and promoting targeted messages about specific behaviours and actions individuals can take to reduce risk are necessary to support large-scale behaviour change. Learning from the COVID-19 response to more effectively integrate novel behaviours into existing health promotion will be vital for disease prevention and outbreak resilience.What is already known on this topicFacilitating COVID-19 prevention behaviours of hand hygiene, mask use and physical distancing in low- and-middle income countries comes with unique challengesIdentifying effective strategies to promote adoption of key behaviours in diverse contexts over a period of rapid change will be key for future pandemic preparednessWhat this study addsThis multi-country analysis of areas where WaterAid implemented an initial mass media COVID-19 response in 2020 observed lower practice of handwashing at novel COVID-19 prevention moments compared to established moments and variable physical distancing behaviour, and examined behaviour-specific determinants and normsHow this study might affect research, practice or policyRenewed focus on identified key drivers of behaviour: targeting critical age-groups and vulnerable populations, increasing descriptive norms and motives of protecting others and respect, and reducing common barriers, with targeted messaging for novel handwashing moments, may be key to ongoing COVID-19 responseLearning from the rapid COVID-19 response on how well we are able to promote novel behaviours alongside established ones in a variety of contexts can inform future disease prevention and outbreak resilience.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWaterAid has received funding from the Hygiene Behaviour Change Coalition (HBCC) initiative set-up by Unilever and the UK Department for International Development (now Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) in response to COVID-19 in five countries (Ethiopia, Ghana, Nepal, Tanzania, Zambia) and Heineken African Foundation (HAF) in two countries (Rwanda and Nigeria). With the additional funding from HBCC initiative and HAF, WaterAid has scaled-up hygiene response to COVID-19 in many countries including these seven countries, thanks to the funders. This study is partly funded by HBCC funding and WaterAid internal resources. SB, SW, AHT, MNDF and RD were supported by the COVID-19 Hygiene Hub, funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of any funding organisation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Ethics Committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine gave ethical approval for this work (Reference #22900).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.